Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
Close-up headshots and environmental portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For portrait work—whether you’re crafting crisp close-up headshots or story-driven environmental portraits—small differences in skin texture, eye detail, hair edges, and background separation matter. Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 both target high-quality portrait generation, but they excel in different parts of a portrait workflow.
Below is a practical comparison focused on portrait outcomes: how reliably each model delivers flattering faces, photoreal detail, and consistent results, plus which one is better when you need editing, style control, or repeatable “same-person” looks across a series.
Portrait — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Portrait photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing an oversized cream sweater and high-waisted jeans, holding her phone slightly out like she’s filming a quick “coffee check-in” and looking near the camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s seated by a café window with a latte and laptop on the table, natural window light on her face, shallow depth of field with warm bokeh from background café lights, realistic 85mm lens feel. Candid, approachable Instagram-story vibe—slightly imperfect framing, lived-in details, not editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Stronger portrait workflow flexibility: text-to-image plus image-to-image editing for refining headshots and environmental scenes
- LoRA support for consistent identity/style across a portrait series (useful for campaigns and creator “signature looks”)
- Face-swap support for controlled portrait variations and fast iteration on the same composition
- Up to 4MP output for sharper crops on close-ups (eyes, lashes, hairlines) and cleaner delivery formats
- Style transfer options to move between editorial, cinematic, or lifestyle portrait aesthetics without restarting from scratch
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealistic portrait detail (skin texture, micro-contrast, hair strands) when you want a premium finish
- Strong out-of-the-box realism for close-up headshots with minimal prompt tuning
- High perceived clarity and polish that suits beauty, fashion, and professional profile portraits
- Simple, generation-first workflow that prioritizes final-image quality over complex editing steps
- Better fit when your main goal is a single “hero” portrait with premium realism
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 if your priority is premium, photoreal portrait output—especially for close-up headshots where realism and fine detail are the main KPI. It’s also priced simply at 16 credits per image, which makes premium portrait generation straightforward to budget.
Choose Flux 2 if you need a more complete portrait production workflow: iterative image-to-image edits, style transfer, face-swap, and LoRA-driven consistency for recurring characters or creator branding. Note that pricing varies by mode (22 credits Standard or 16 credits Klein 9B per image), so it can be cost-competitive depending on which option you use.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for portrait.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand