Flux 2 vs Flux Ultra 1.1
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Flux Ultra 1.1 are both strong choices for creating 3D graphics in Influencer Studio—think CGI environments, product-style renders, character concepts, and stylized digital art. The key difference is workflow: Flux 2 emphasizes versatility (editing, iteration, and customization), while Flux Ultra 1.1 prioritizes premium, ultra-detailed output.
If your 3D pipeline involves frequent revisions—changing materials, swapping elements, or matching a specific CGI look—Flux 2’s broader toolset can speed up production. If you mainly need the cleanest, most photoreal “final render” look with minimal tweaking, Flux Ultra 1.1 is positioned as the higher-fidelity generator.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine look) of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a casual oversized hoodie and bike shorts, holding her phone up for a front-camera selfie while glancing near the lens with a relaxed half-smile. She’s in a small sunlit kitchen making iced coffee on a messy countertop (oat milk carton, coffee jar, condensation on the glass), natural morning window light with soft volumetric rays, subsurface scattering on skin, physically-based materials on stainless appliances and glossy tiles. Candid UGC vibe, slight wide-angle phone perspective, imperfect framing like an Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Flux Ultra 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Black Forest Labs |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 16 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Flexible 3D art workflow: supports text-to-image plus image-to-image editing for iterative CGI refinements (materials, lighting mood, composition)
- LoRA support for consistent 3D styles—useful for matching a studio look across scenes, characters, or product renders
- Up to 4MP output for sharper edges and more usable crops in 3D renders and digital art layouts
- Style transfer helps quickly explore stylized CGI directions (toon shading, cinematic grading, game-art aesthetics)
- Optional face-swap support for concepting character-driven CGI scenes (where appropriate to your use case)
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional detail for 3D graphics—strong at crisp micro-textures, realistic surfaces, and high-frequency render detail
- Photorealistic output that suits “final frame” CGI stills, product-style renders, and cinematic realism
- Premium quality look with fewer prompts/iterations needed when realism is the main goal
- Straightforward generation flow (text-to-image) for quickly producing polished 3D-style images
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your 3D graphics work is iterative and brand- or style-driven: you want editing control, image-to-image adjustments, and LoRA-based consistency across a series of CGI scenes. It’s also a good fit when you need higher resolution (up to 4MP) for crops, posters, or multi-use assets.
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 if your priority is the most premium, photoreal “finished render” look per image—especially for realistic CGI stills and product-like 3D visuals. It’s also cost-efficient at 16 credits per image, matching Flux 2’s Klein 9B price and undercutting Flux 2 Standard.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Flux Ultra 1.1, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand