GPT-Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.5
Interior design, staging, and property listings — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For real estate and interiors, image quality isn’t just aesthetic—it impacts perceived space, finishes, and buyer confidence. Influencer Studio’s GPT-Image 1.5 and Seedream 4.5 both produce listing-grade visuals, but they excel in different parts of the workflow: generating new scenes vs refining and editing existing rooms.
This comparison focuses on common property-marketing needs like virtual staging, style variations (modern, Scandinavian, mid-century), accurate materials (wood grain, marble veining, metal finishes), and consistent lighting that feels like a real shoot. We’ll also look at credit costs for typical deliverables—hero images, room sets, and high-detail close-ups.
Real Estate & Interiors — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera wide‑angle shot of a 20s–30s woman with shoulder‑length wavy brown hair in an oversized cream sweater and black leggings, standing in a bright, beautifully staged modern living room and looking near the camera while casually pointing at the open-plan kitchen behind her like she’s filming an Instagram story home tour. The room looks like a Zillow/Airbnb hero image: clean white walls, large window with sheer curtains, light oak floors, plush neutral sofa, textured throw pillows, minimalist coffee table, a tall plant, and subtle luxury decor, all lit by soft natural window light. Slight handheld feel, natural skin texture, everyday vibe (not editorial), airy and inviting interior emphasis."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 16 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Excellent prompt adherence for room layouts, furniture lists, and specific design directions (e.g., “white oak floors, black-framed windows, warm 3000K lighting”)
- High-fidelity detail for textures and finishes—useful for upscale listings and close-up vignettes (tile, stone, textiles, hardware)
- Strong at generating complete, cohesive scenes from text for concept boards, new-build marketing, and “idealized” interiors
- Flexible output sizing/quality tiers (8/16/32 credits) to match draft concepts vs hero listing images
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Powerful image-to-image editing for real-world workflows: adjust decor, swap styles, or refine a room while keeping the original structure
- High-resolution output suited to listing galleries, brochures, and social crops without losing clarity in key details
- Versatile style range for quick staging variations (minimalist, luxury contemporary, coastal, industrial) across multiple rooms
- Predictable per-image pricing (16 credits) that’s easy to budget for editing-heavy staging projects
Verdict
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you need text-first generation with tight adherence—ideal for creating brand-new interior concepts, producing multiple room angles from a written brief, or generating high-detail hero images where materials and lighting need to read as premium.
Choose Seedream 4.5 when your priority is editing and iteration on existing photos or prior renders—best for virtual staging, quick style swaps, decluttering, and producing listing-ready variations while preserving the property’s original layout. For many teams, a practical approach is: draft concepts with GPT-Image 1.5, then refine and localize to the actual space with Seedream 4.5.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for real estate & interiors.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand