GPT-Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.5
Restaurant, cooking, and food styling content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Food photography lives or dies on realism: accurate textures (steam, crisp edges, glossy sauces), believable lighting, and plating that looks intentional—not accidental. On Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Seedream 4.5 both generate high-quality food imagery, but they shine in different parts of a restaurant and cooking workflow.
This comparison focuses on common needs for menus, social content, recipe steps, and brand campaigns: prompt accuracy for specific dishes, consistency across a series, and the ability to revise plating, props, or backgrounds without restarting from scratch.
Food Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Casual influencer food shot: a woman in her mid-20s with wavy brown hair in a messy bun, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and simple gold hoops, leaning over a small café table and glancing near the phone camera as she reaches in with a fork. Dramatic 45-degree food photography angle focusing on a beautifully plated avocado toast with poached egg, chili flakes, microgreens, and a side salad on a ceramic plate, with a linen napkin, matte black cutlery, and an iced latte as props; cozy café background slightly blurred. Natural window light, subtle shadows, real smartphone-camera feel like an Instagram story thumbnail."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 16 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for precise dishes, ingredients, camera angles, and plating notes (e.g., “overhead flat lay, matte ceramic, microgreens, shallow DOF”).
- High-fidelity textures and micro-details that matter in food shots (crumb structure, sear marks, condensation on glassware, sauce sheen).
- Detailed multi-element scenes for restaurant storytelling (table settings, hands plating, kitchen pass, ambient bokeh) with clear composition control.
- Flexible credit tiers (8/16/32 credits) that can fit quick concepting vs premium hero images depending on quality needs.
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Image-to-image editing for iterative food styling—adjust garnishes, swap plates, change backgrounds, or refine lighting while keeping the core shot.
- High-resolution outputs suited to menu boards, print-ready promos, and tight crops on hero dishes without losing clarity.
- Versatile styles for brand-matching (rustic farmhouse, modern minimal, high-contrast flash, pastel café aesthetic) across a campaign.
- Predictable per-image pricing (16 credits) that’s easy to budget for repeated revisions and variations.
Verdict
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you need the model to follow a tightly written food brief from scratch—specific ingredients, plating geometry, and scene complexity—especially for concept-to-final generation and multi-subject restaurant scenes.
Choose Seedream 4.5 when your workflow depends on refining an existing image: making quick food-styling adjustments, keeping composition consistent across variations, and delivering high-resolution assets for menus and brand campaigns. For many creators, a practical approach is generating the initial hero concept with GPT-Image 1.5, then using Seedream 4.5 to iterate on plating and props efficiently.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for food photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand