GPT-Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.5
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci‑fi visuals live or die on atmosphere: neon haze, dense city layers, reflective rain-slick streets, and believable futuristic tech. In Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Seedream 4.5 both target high-quality generation, but they shine in different parts of a typical cyberpunk workflow.
This comparison focuses on neon cityscapes, dystopian environments, and tech-forward design details—plus how each model handles prompt accuracy, scene complexity, and iteration speed. You’ll also see how pricing maps to common use cases like concept exploration, final key art, and edit-heavy refinement.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length teal-dyed hair in a messy half-up clip, wearing a black oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and chunky sneakers, holds her phone at arm’s length for a rainy street selfie, glancing near the camera with a relaxed “just stepped out” expression. She’s under a neon ramen shop awning in a futuristic cyberpunk city, rain-slick pavement reflecting pink/blue/purple signage and holographic ads drifting in the background, with a few commuters in LED jackets passing behind her. Natural phone-camera look with soft streetlight + neon spill, slight motion blur from drizzle, candid UGC vibe (like an Instagram story)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 16 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for complex cyberpunk briefs (e.g., specific neon signage colors, camera angles, and mood cues)
- High-fidelity detail in dense scenes like layered skylines, street markets, and rainy alleyways
- Reliable generation of cohesive lighting (neon rim light, volumetric haze, reflections) across the full frame
- Flexible credit tiers (8/16/32) that suit quick explorations through to more premium renders
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Powerful image-to-image editing for refining cyberpunk shots (iterate on outfits, props, signage, or environment without restarting)
- High-resolution output that holds up for posters, thumbnails, and wide cityscape compositions
- Versatile style handling—from gritty dystopian realism to sleek, glossy sci‑fi concept art
- Simple per-image pricing (16 credits) that’s easy to budget for edit-driven workflows
Verdict
If your priority is nailing a detailed cyberpunk scene directly from text—especially when the prompt includes many constraints—GPT-Image 1.5 is the stronger starting point. It’s well-suited to generating neon cityscapes with coherent lighting and lots of micro-detail in a single pass, and the tiered pricing makes it easy to choose between fast drafts and higher-effort finals.
If your workflow involves heavy refinement—keeping a base composition while changing armor, tech props, color palettes, or dystopian set dressing—Seedream 4.5 is the better fit thanks to image-to-image editing and consistently high-resolution output. Many creators will use GPT-Image 1.5 for initial concept generation, then switch to Seedream 4.5 to iterate and polish hero frames.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand