GPT-Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.5
Gym, workout, and active lifestyle content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Creating standout Fitness & Wellness visuals demands more than a good-looking image—it requires accurate anatomy, believable movement, clean gym environments, and on-brand styling across a full content calendar. On Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Seedream 4.5 are both strong options for generating workout, gym, and active lifestyle imagery.
This comparison focuses on what matters for fitness creators and brands: prompt adherence for specific exercises, consistency across a series (e.g., “12-week program” posts), detail in equipment and lighting, and how easily you can iterate—either by regenerating from text or editing an existing image.
Fitness & Wellness — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a slightly damp ponytail, wearing a sage-green sports bra and high-waisted black leggings, holds her phone up for a gym mirror selfie and looks just off the lens with a relaxed post-workout smile, a light sheen of sweat and earbuds in. Real commercial gym locker room with benches, a tote bag and water bottle on the floor, smudged mirror and fluorescent/natural mixed lighting from a nearby window, casual “just finished leg day” vibe. Shot like an Instagram story with handheld phone-camera framing, imperfect composition and authentic motion blur."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 16 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for specific exercises, poses, and scene requirements (e.g., “Romanian deadlift setup, neutral spine, bar close to shins”).
- High-fidelity detail for gym environments—equipment, textures, lighting, and realistic scene density (racks, plates, mirrors, flooring).
- Performs well for detailed multi-subject scenes like partner workouts, class-style sessions, or “before/after” style storytelling frames.
- Flexible credit tiers (8/16/32) make it easier to choose quick drafts vs higher-detail final renders depending on the post.
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Strong image-to-image editing for fitness workflows—refine an existing shot, adjust wardrobe, swap backgrounds, or correct small composition issues without starting over.
- High-resolution output that holds up well for feed posts, banners, and crop-heavy formats (e.g., 4:5 to 9:16 repurposing).
- Versatile style range for fitness branding—from clean studio product vibes to gritty training aesthetics to lifestyle outdoor cardio scenes.
- Simple, predictable pricing (16 credits per image) that’s easy to budget for consistent production.
Verdict
If your priority is nailing the prompt for specific gym movements, detailed scenes, and precise art direction from scratch, GPT-Image 1.5 is often the better fit—especially when you want to choose between faster low-credit drafts and higher-credit final images.
If your workflow relies on iterating from an existing image—fixing details, keeping a consistent look, or making small brand-safe adjustments—Seedream 4.5 stands out thanks to its editing strengths and consistently high-quality output at a flat per-image cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for fitness & wellness.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand

