GPT-Image 1.5 vs Seedream 4.5
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for dating profile photos is about more than sharpness—it’s about creating images that feel attractive, approachable, and authentic. The best results usually nail flattering lighting, natural expressions, realistic skin texture, and a “caught in the moment” vibe that doesn’t read as overly staged.
On Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Seedream 4.5 both produce high-quality dating app-ready images, but they differ in how they handle prompt control, realism, and iteration. Below is a practical comparison focused on profile-photo staples like headshots, candid lifestyle shots, and subtle enhancements that still look like you.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile-style selfie of an attractive, approachable woman (mid-20s), shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a cozy oversized cream sweater and high-waisted jeans, holding her phone slightly above eye level and smiling warmly while looking near the camera. She’s walking through a leafy city park on a sunny afternoon, golden-hour natural light on her face, background slightly blurred with people and trees for a real “out for a walk” vibe. Shot like an Instagram story frame—natural lighting, casual composition, authentic and unposed."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 16 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for dialing in specific dating-photo traits (warm smile, eye contact, natural posture, flattering focal length)
- High-fidelity detail that supports realistic textures (hair, fabric, skin) when prompts emphasize naturalism
- Per-credit quality scaling (8/16/32 credits) makes it easier to iterate cheaply before committing to premium outputs
- Handles detailed scenes well for lifestyle dating shots (coffee shop, park walk, rooftop evening) while keeping the subject prominent
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Image-to-image editing is ideal for refining an existing photo (adjust vibe, background, outfit styling, or lighting) while keeping identity consistent
- High-resolution output helps with crisp, platform-ready crops (headshot, 3/4 portrait, full-body) without losing clarity
- Versatile styles for matching different dating app aesthetics (clean modern, film-like candid, editorial, outdoorsy lifestyle)
- Simple per-image pricing (16 credits) is predictable for targeted edits and final selects
Verdict
If you’re starting from scratch and want tight prompt control to generate multiple dating-profile concepts quickly (from “approachable professional” to “weekend casual”), GPT-Image 1.5 is a strong pick—especially because you can iterate at lower credit tiers before rendering your finalists.
If you already have a decent photo and want it to look more polished, flattering, and profile-ready without changing who you are, Seedream 4.5 stands out thanks to its editing workflow and high-resolution output. Many creators use GPT-Image 1.5 for exploration, then Seedream 4.5 to refine the best candidate images.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand