Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Vintage & Retro visuals live or die by the details: believable film grain, era-accurate color response, gentle halation, and that slightly imperfect “printed” feel. On Influencer Studio, both Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 can produce nostalgic imagery—but they approach the look from different strengths.
Below is a focused comparison on retro aesthetics and film-inspired finishes, including how each model handles grain, color aging, texture, and scene fidelity—plus how their credit pricing impacts iteration when you’re dialing in the perfect throwback vibe.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a slightly oversized vintage band tee and high-waisted light-wash jeans holds a takeaway coffee and glances toward the phone camera mid-laugh while standing in line at a small corner café. Shot like an old disposable camera flash photo—warm nostalgic tones, soft film grain, slightly faded colors, and a subtle light leak along the edge—messy background with menu board and people blurred behind her. Natural window light mixed with on-camera flash, casual Instagram-story vibe, imperfect framing like a friend snapped it."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Editing-first workflow for retro refinement: strong image-to-image and style transfer tools make it easy to add film grain, soften contrast, and shift palettes without re-generating from scratch
- LoRA fine-tuning support to lock in a consistent era look (e.g., 70s color cast, 90s flash photography, VHS poster styling) across a full campaign
- Up to 4MP output helps preserve “analog texture” details like grain structure, paper fibers, and subtle lens artifacts in final exports
- Face-swap support can keep talent consistent while applying different nostalgic treatments (useful for multi-post series with a unified retro identity)
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for era-specific direction (e.g., “Kodachrome-like warmth,” “faded magazine print,” “1980s mall lighting”) with less back-and-forth
- High-fidelity, detailed scenes that hold up when you add retro cues like dust, scratches, and film borders—especially in complex compositions
- Flexible quality tiers (low/medium/high) make it easier to prototype retro looks cheaply, then upscale to a premium render once the vibe is approved
- Reliable for text-to-image nostalgia concepts where you want the first generation to closely match a detailed retro brief
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your Vintage & Retro workflow depends on iterative editing: applying grain and aging effects to existing images, maintaining consistent faces, and standardizing a signature throwback style via LoRA. It’s particularly effective when you’re building a cohesive retro “brand filter” across many assets.
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 if you want highly faithful text-to-image results for specific retro directions and detailed scenes, with an easy path from low-cost drafts to high-quality finals. For prompt-driven nostalgia (where the brief is precise and the composition is complex), it tends to feel more direct.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand