Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Polished ad creative for social platforms — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Creating scroll-stopping Social Media Ad visuals demands more than a pretty image: you need consistent branding, fast iteration, on-brief compositions, and outputs that look polished on mobile-first placements.
This comparison looks at how Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 perform inside Influencer Studio for ad-ready creative—covering prompt adherence, editing flexibility, style consistency, resolution, and how pricing tiers affect campaign workflows.
Social Media Ad — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oatmeal sweater and high-waisted jeans sits at a bright window-side café table, glancing toward the phone camera mid-laugh while holding an iced coffee in one hand and a sleek white wireless earbud case in the other (logo facing out). Candid “day in my life” UGC ad vibe with a pastry and laptop in the background, natural daylight from the window, slight handheld phone perspective like an Instagram Story. Clean, aspirational but relatable product placement, minimal makeup, soft shadows, real café clutter and street reflections outside."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Flexible ad iteration with image-to-image editing for quick variations (background swaps, product repositioning, lighting tweaks)
- LoRA support to keep brand style consistent across a campaign (useful for repeatable color palettes, aesthetics, or product look)
- Up to 4MP output for crisp feeds, stories, and repurposing across placements without looking soft
- Style transfer tools that help match influencer UGC vibes or premium studio looks depending on the ad concept
- Face-swap support for creator-style ads and localized talent variations (when permissions and compliance are in place)
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for nailing specific ad concepts (props, scene details, composition notes) with fewer retries
- High-fidelity rendering that helps products and materials look premium (useful for beauty, fashion, food, and tech ads)
- Detailed scenes that support lifestyle storytelling ads (multi-object setups, environments, and richer context)
- Multiple quality tiers (low/medium/high) to balance speed and polish across ideation vs final exports
- Reliable text-to-image performance for rapid concept exploration before locking a final direction
Verdict
For Social Media Ads, Flux 2 is the better fit when your workflow depends on editing, versioning, and brand consistency—especially if you plan to reuse a signature look across many creatives or need controlled transformations from an existing image. Its 4MP output and LoRA support are particularly helpful for campaign-scale production.
GPT-Image 1.5 is the stronger choice when you want high-fidelity, on-brief images from prompts with minimal back-and-forth—ideal for teams prioritizing prompt-driven concepting and premium-looking lifestyle scenes. If you’ll iterate mostly by re-prompting rather than editing, its adherence and tiered pricing can be a practical advantage.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for social media ad.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand