Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Stock photography demands more than good-looking images: you need clean, commercially usable visuals with believable lighting, natural anatomy, minimal artifacts, and flexible compositions that can fit many briefs. Consistency across a set (same subject, wardrobe, environment, and framing) also matters for creating cohesive stock collections.
Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 both target high-quality image creation on Influencer Studio, but they approach stock needs differently. Below is a practical comparison focused on realism, prompt reliability, editability, and cost efficiency for producing versatile, licensable stock-style images.
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s woman with shoulder-length curly dark hair in a cozy oversized hoodie and leggings holds her phone at arm’s length for a casual selfie video, looking just off the camera with a relaxed half-smile while standing at a bright kitchen counter with a coffee mug and laptop in the background. Morning natural window light, clean stock-photo composition, slightly imperfect framing like an Instagram story “work from home” check-in."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Strong editing workflow (image-to-image, style transfer) for iterating toward stock-safe results without restarting from scratch
- LoRA support for building consistent, reusable stock series (e.g., same model, brand-like look, recurring locations) across many images
- Up to 4MP output helps with sharper details and more crop flexibility for common stock aspect ratios and layouts
- Face-swap support can accelerate creating variations (while still requiring careful review for realism and compliance)
- Two pricing tiers (22 credits Standard, 16 credits Klein 9B) offer flexibility when scaling large stock batches
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for reliably hitting specific stock briefs (wardrobe, setting, camera angle, mood, props)
- High-fidelity rendering that suits polished, “ready-to-license” stock aesthetics with fewer re-rolls
- Detailed scenes perform well for lifestyle, workplace, travel, and editorial-style stock compositions
- Multiple quality price points (8/16/32 credits) make it easy to balance budget vs. detail depending on the shoot concept
- Good choice when you need consistent interpretation of complex prompts across many concepts
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when your stock workflow depends on iterative editing, creating cohesive collections, or maintaining a consistent “house style” via LoRA. It’s particularly useful for building repeatable series (same subject and look across multiple scenarios) and for refining near-misses into licensable, clean results.
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when prompt accuracy and high-fidelity generation are the priority—especially for one-off briefs where you want the model to “nail the prompt” with minimal back-and-forth. Its tiered pricing also makes it convenient for quickly producing large volumes of concept variations at lower cost, then reserving higher settings for hero images.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand