Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die on atmosphere: neon spill on wet pavement, dense signage, believable futuristic tech, and a cohesive dystopian mood. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 both target high-quality image generation, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
This comparison focuses on neon cityscapes, futuristic interfaces, armored street fashion, and cinematic dystopian environments—plus how each model handles prompt control, iterative refinement, and cost when producing social-ready assets.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s Asian woman with a short black bob and subtle neon eyeliner, wearing an oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and chunky sneakers, holds her phone up for a slightly messy street selfie while glancing near the camera with a half-smile. She’s under a glowing ramen stall awning in a rain-slick cyberpunk alley, surrounded by pink-blue-purple neon signs, drifting steam, and holographic ads reflecting in puddles and on her clear umbrella. Natural phone-camera look with mixed neon + cloudy ambient light, slight motion blur like a quick TikTok story grab."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- LoRA support for consistent cyberpunk branding (recurring character, outfit silhouettes, logo-like motifs, or a signature neon palette)
- Versatile image-to-image editing for iterative worldbuilding: adjust signage, swap props, refine armor details, and restyle scenes without restarting
- Up to 4MP output for crisp cityscape detail (dense skylines, holographic ads, street clutter) and cleaner crops for multiple aspect ratios
- Style transfer that helps lock in a specific dystopian look (gritty film grain, synthwave neon glow, or hard-edged industrial tones)
- Face-swap support for creator-led cyberpunk posters and character-driven sci-fi thumbnails
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for precise sci-fi direction (camera angle, lighting cues, material callouts like chrome/carbon fiber, and scene constraints)
- High-fidelity rendering that elevates micro-detail in complex frames (crowded alleys, layered reflections, intricate tech surfaces)
- Detailed scene composition that’s well-suited to wide establishing shots and cinematic neon city panoramas
- Flexible quality tiers (low/medium/high) to match ideation vs final-polish needs and manage credits per iteration
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your cyberpunk workflow depends on repeatable style and heavy iteration—especially when you need to edit existing images, maintain character consistency via LoRAs, or produce higher-resolution outputs for multi-platform crops. It’s a strong fit for ongoing series content (recurring protagonist, consistent streetwear, consistent city district look).
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 if your priority is prompt-true, high-fidelity generation of complex sci-fi scenes from scratch—particularly when you want the model to follow detailed art direction reliably. Its tiered pricing also makes it easy to do quick neon concept passes on low, then reserve high for hero frames.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand