Character Design Comparison

Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5

Original characters, game characters, and mascots — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

Designing original characters, game-ready heroes, and memorable mascots demands more than “pretty images.” You need consistent silhouettes, readable costumes, clean facial features, and the ability to iterate—fast—across poses, expressions, and style directions.

This comparison looks at how Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 perform inside Influencer Studio for character design workflows: concept exploration, style locking, edit passes, and producing polished character art that stays on-brief.

Character Design — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"A candid phone-camera selfie of an original influencer character (early 20s, warm brown skin with freckles, big round glasses, asymmetrical honey-blonde curls with one shaved side), wearing an oversized mint hoodie layered over biker shorts, chunky sneakers, and a crossbody sling bag with cute enamel pins—distinctive silhouette and stylized proportions like a game character concept, standing in a clear turnaround-ready pose while still feeling natural. She’s in a bright neighborhood café by the window, one hand holding an iced matcha and the other holding the phone slightly above eye level, looking near the camera mid-laugh like a TikTok thumbnail; include subtle design details like nail art, a star-shaped hair clip, and a small bandage on one knee. Natural morning window light, slight handheld blur, realistic clutter (menu board, pastry case, backpack on chair), authentic Instagram-story vibe—no cinematic lighting, no editorial styling."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux 2GPT-Image 1.5
ProviderBlack Forest LabsOpenAI
Subcategoriestext-to-image, image-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeYesNo
NSFW RatingLowStrict
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:31:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Model VariantStandard, Klein 9B
Starting Price22 credits8 credits

Flux 2 Strengths

  • LoRA support for building and reusing a consistent character look across outfits, poses, and scenes
  • Versatile image editing (image-to-image) for iterative character refinement—costume tweaks, accessory swaps, and style adjustments
  • Up to 4MP output for sharper linework, texture detail, and cleaner presentation sheets
  • Style transfer options that help explore multiple art directions (mascot, anime, semi-real, stylized) from the same base concept
  • Face-swap support for quickly testing alternate facial variants while keeping the rest of the design stable

GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths

  • Strong prompt adherence for nailing specific character requirements (materials, color palettes, era, archetype, and constraints)
  • High-fidelity rendering that supports polished key art and more detailed character scenes
  • Reliable for complex prompts that combine character + environment + action while keeping the core description intact
  • Flexible quality tiers (low/medium/high) to balance speed, cost, and final output during concept-to-polish workflows

Verdict

Choose Flux 2 when your character design workflow depends on iteration and consistency—especially if you want to lock an OC or mascot identity and keep it stable across many variations. Its editing toolkit and LoRA support make it a strong fit for production-style pipelines (turnarounds, outfit packs, expression sheets, and brand mascot exploration).

Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you want high-fidelity character renders with tight prompt compliance, particularly for “one-shot” key art or when your brief is detailed and must be followed closely. Its tiered pricing is also useful for rapid ideation at low cost, then upgrading to higher quality for final selects.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for character design.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand