Flux 2 vs GPT-Image 1.5
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model matters when your goal is 3D graphics: clean CGI lighting, believable materials, consistent character design, and camera-like composition. On Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and GPT-Image 1.5 both generate impressive 3D renders and digital art, but they shine in different parts of a 3D workflow.
This comparison focuses on how each model handles CGI scenes, product-style renders, environment concept art, and stylized 3D illustrations—including prompt control, scene detail, editing flexibility, and how pricing tiers affect iteration speed.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine look) of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a cozy oversized hoodie and biker shorts, holding a phone at arm’s length for a casual selfie video while glancing near the camera with a half-smile. She’s standing in a small sunlit kitchen beside a cluttered counter (coffee mug, avocado toast, skincare bottles), morning window light casting soft volumetric rays with realistic subsurface scattering on skin and physically-based materials on tiles and stainless appliances. Slight handheld framing, candid “GRWM breakfast” vibe, natural imperfections like flyaway hairs and subtle under-eye shadows, not editorial or cinematic."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Workflow-friendly editing for 3D: strong image-to-image iteration to refine camera angle, lighting mood, or material finish without restarting from scratch
- LoRA support for consistent 3D style and assets (useful for keeping the same character, product, or brand look across multiple renders)
- Up to 4MP output for sharper render-like detail in textures, edges, and small scene elements
- Versatile style transfer for switching between stylized CGI (toon/Clay/Octane-like looks) and more realistic 3D aesthetics
- Face-swap support for creator-led CGI portraits or consistent hero characters in 3D scenes
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for 3D scenes with specific requirements (camera lens feel, composition rules, object placement, and scene descriptions)
- High-fidelity output that excels at dense, detailed CGI environments and polished digital art finishes
- Flexible quality tiers (low/medium/high) to match your 3D iteration cycle—fast drafts vs final-quality renders
- Reliable for “single-shot” 3D concept images when you want the model to closely follow a detailed prompt
Verdict
Pick Flux 2 if your 3D graphics workflow depends on editing and iteration: refining an existing render, maintaining a consistent CGI style with LoRA, or producing higher-resolution outputs for close-up detail. It’s particularly strong for teams building repeatable 3D looks across a series (characters, products, or branded scenes).
Pick GPT-Image 1.5 if you prioritize prompt-accurate, high-fidelity 3D scenes and want predictable results from a detailed text brief. Its pricing tiers are also convenient for rapid ideation (low) and stepping up to final-quality passes (high) when the composition is locked.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand