Grok Imagine vs Seedream 4.5
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing an image model for stock photography is less about flashy effects and more about producing clean, versatile, commercially usable-looking visuals: natural lighting, believable people and environments, minimal artifacts, and compositions that leave room for copy.
This comparison looks at how Grok Imagine and Seedream 4.5 perform inside Influencer Studio for stock-style outputs—covering photorealism, consistency across sets, editing workflows, and overall value per image credit.
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A diverse woman in her mid-20s with shoulder-length curly hair, wearing a casual oversized hoodie and biker shorts, holds her phone slightly above eye level for a candid selfie while glancing toward the camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s in a bright kitchen making iced coffee, one hand stirring a glass on a simple countertop with everyday clutter (fruit bowl, keys, mail) in the background; natural window light, clean stock-photo composition, realistic smartphone camera look. Subtle motion blur from movement, authentic Instagram Stories/UGC ad vibe (not editorial, not cinematic)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 16 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong photorealistic output that suits modern stock aesthetics (natural light, crisp detail, believable scenes)
- Creative compositions that can still read as “usable stock” when prompted for simplicity and negative space
- High detail rendering that works well for product, lifestyle, and travel-style stock images
- Better cost efficiency for high-volume stock generation at 4 credits per image
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- More robust image-to-image editing workflows for iterating toward stock-safe results (small fixes, variations, refinements)
- High-resolution output that supports cropping and multiple aspect ratios common in stock libraries
- Versatile styling range for producing consistent looks across different stock categories (lifestyle, editorial-style, minimal studio)
- Strong option when you need controlled revisions rather than repeated re-generation
Verdict
If your priority is high-volume, photorealistic stock-style generation with strong detail at a lower cost, Grok Imagine is typically the better value at 4 credits per image—especially for broad, versatile sets like lifestyle, travel, and generic business scenes.
If your priority is iterative refinement—making targeted edits, polishing a near-miss into a stock-usable final, and exporting higher-resolution assets—Seedream 4.5 is often the stronger pick, though it comes at a higher price point of 16 credits per image.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand