Grok Imagine vs Seedream 4.5
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die by atmosphere: neon spill on wet pavement, dense megacity skylines, readable holographic UI, and believable futuristic materials. On Influencer Studio, Grok Imagine and Seedream 4.5 both target high-quality image generation, but they shine in different parts of the workflow.
This comparison focuses on neon cityscapes, futuristic tech design, and dystopian aesthetics—looking at how each model handles detail, realism, creative composition, and iteration speed, alongside pricing per image.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s Asian woman with shoulder-length black hair and wispy bangs wears a thrifted oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and chunky sneakers, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie video while glancing near the camera with a half-smile. She’s under a neon ramen-stall awning on a rain-slick cyberpunk side street, pink-blue-purple signage reflecting off puddles, holographic menu boards flickering behind her and a few commuters with glowing umbrellas passing by. Shot like an Instagram story on a phone camera with natural street lighting mixed with neon glow, slight motion blur and realistic skin texture, candid and unposed."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 16 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong creative composition for cinematic cyberpunk scenes (dynamic angles, layered depth, dramatic lighting)
- Photorealistic rendering that sells neon reflections, rain-soaked streets, and gritty dystopian textures
- High detail output for dense cityscapes—signage, cables, street clutter, and background architecture
- Cost-efficient for rapid ideation and prompt iteration at 4 credits per image
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Best choice when you need image-to-image editing for precise refinements (outfits, props, signage, scene adjustments)
- High-resolution output that holds up for posters, thumbnails, and crops of neon-heavy compositions
- Versatile style handling—from glossy futuristic tech to grimy dystopian realism and stylized synthwave variants
- More controlled iteration on an existing frame, useful for consistent cyberpunk series visuals (at 16 credits per image)
Verdict
If you’re generating fresh cyberpunk concepts—new neon cityscapes, moody alley shots, or cinematic sci-fi establishing frames—Grok Imagine is the more cost-effective pick and excels at bold, photoreal, high-detail creations for only 4 credits per image.
If your workflow depends on editing and refining (locking a composition, then iterating on tech details, wardrobe, props, or scene elements), Seedream 4.5 earns its higher 16-credit cost with stronger image-to-image editing and high-resolution polish—especially for campaign-grade assets and consistent series outputs.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand