Photorealistic Comparison

Grok Imagine vs Seedream 4.5

Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

When your goal is truly photorealistic output—skin texture that holds up to zoom, natural lens behavior, believable lighting, and scenes that read like camera captures—model choice matters. Grok Imagine and Seedream 4.5 are both strong options inside Influencer Studio, but they approach “hyperreal” results a bit differently.

Below is a focused comparison of how each performs for photo-indistinguishable renders, including consistency, detail fidelity, editing workflows, and how far your credits go per final image.

Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"Hyperrealistic photoreal DSLR-quality image of a 20s influencer with shoulder-length wavy dark-brown hair and minimal makeup, wearing an oversized cream hoodie and black leggings, holding a phone up for a casual mirror selfie while glancing slightly toward the camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s in a slightly messy bedroom “get ready with me” moment—unmade bed, open closet, skincare bottles on a dresser, soft morning window light casting natural shadows and realistic skin texture/imperfections. Shot in vertical 9:16, handheld phone-camera feel, true-to-life colors, no glam lighting, no editorial posing."

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrok ImagineSeedream 4.5
ProviderxAIByteDance
Subcategoriestext-to-image, image-to-imagetext-to-image, image-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeNoNo
NSFW RatingLowLow
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:31:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Starting Price4 credits16 credits

Grok Imagine Strengths

  • Strong photorealistic rendering at a low cost (4 credits/image), making iterative refinement practical
  • High-detail output with convincing materials, textures, and lighting for camera-like realism
  • Excellent at creative, cinematic compositions while still maintaining a photographic look
  • Efficient for bulk generation and A/B testing prompts to land on the most realistic result

Seedream 4.5 Strengths

  • Robust image-to-image editing workflows, useful for refining realism without restarting from scratch
  • High-resolution output that helps preserve fine details (fabric weave, pores, hair strands) in photoreal scenes
  • Versatile control across styles, enabling you to stay photoreal while adjusting mood, lens feel, or art direction
  • Well-suited for polishing: targeted tweaks to lighting, framing, and elements to reduce “AI tells”

Verdict

For photorealistic generation at scale, Grok Imagine is the value leader: it delivers strong hyperreal results while costing far fewer credits per image, which encourages iteration—often the fastest path to photo-indistinguishable outputs.

If your photoreal workflow depends on editing and precision refinement—especially image-to-image adjustments and high-resolution finishing—Seedream 4.5 is the better fit, albeit at a higher per-image credit cost (16 credits) that favors fewer, more deliberate renders.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand