Grok Imagine vs Seedream 4.5
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Creating standout beauty & makeup content means nailing skin texture, accurate undertones, believable lighting, and clean product-focused compositions. On Influencer Studio, Grok Imagine and Seedream 4.5 both support text-to-image and image-to-image workflows, but they shine in different parts of a typical skincare or makeup pipeline.
Below is a practical comparison for skincare campaigns, makeup look concepts, and beauty editorial—including where each model tends to deliver the most reliable results, and how their credit cost can affect high-volume content production.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a cozy oversized hoodie, sitting on her bed in a slightly messy bedroom, looking near the camera while blending cream blush on one cheek with a makeup sponge. Soft ring-light glow mixed with window daylight, dewy flawless skin, natural brows and glossy lips, with a small lineup of everyday products (tinted moisturizer, concealer, setting spray) arranged on the nightstand like a real GRWM TikTok. The vibe feels casual and relatable—mid-application, relaxed posture, a few hair clips holding her bangs back."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 16 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong photorealistic portraits that can highlight believable skin texture, pores, and soft specular highlights (useful for skincare close-ups)
- High-detail rendering for makeup elements like eyeliner edges, shimmer placement, brow hairs, and lip texture
- Creative compositions for editorial beauty concepts (bold lighting setups, stylized backgrounds, and campaign-style framing)
- Cost-efficient for iteration-heavy workflows at 4 credits per image (helpful when exploring multiple looks or colorways)
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Robust image-to-image editing for refining an existing beauty shot (adjusting makeup intensity, cleaning edges, or shifting tones without restarting)
- High-resolution output suited to product hero images, banners, and crop-heavy social formats where detail must hold up
- Versatile styles that adapt well to different beauty aesthetics (clean girl, glam, editorial, K-beauty-inspired softness, etc.)
- Reliable for controlled revisions when a brand needs precise tweaks across a series (shade consistency, lighting continuity, and repeated framing)
Verdict
If your priority is photoreal beauty generation with lots of creative exploration—testing multiple makeup looks, lighting moods, and model variations—Grok Imagine is a strong fit, especially given the lower cost per image. It’s well-suited to ideation, concept boards, and campaign-style visuals where you want high detail and striking composition.
If your workflow depends on editing and refining existing images—for example, adjusting a base look into multiple variants, improving consistency across a carousel, or producing high-res deliverables—Seedream 4.5 is the better pick despite the higher per-image cost. Many beauty teams use it when “small changes” and repeatability matter as much as raw generation.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand