Grok Imagine vs Seedream 4.5
Buildings, facades, and architectural visualization — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For Architecture & Exterior work—buildings, facades, streetscapes, and architectural visualization—image models need more than “pretty” output. Clean geometry, believable materials, consistent lighting, and controllable iteration matter when you’re presenting a concept, marketing a property, or exploring design directions.
This page compares Grok Imagine (4 credits/image) and Seedream 4.5 (16 credits/image) inside Influencer Studio, with a focus on how each handles exterior realism, facade detailing, and practical workflows like revisions and style exploration.
Architecture & Exterior — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera shot of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark hair in a casual hoodie and bike shorts, holding an iced coffee and looking slightly past the lens while standing on a city sidewalk in front of a striking modern glass-and-concrete building exterior. Dramatic low-angle perspective with strong leading lines from the plaza tiles toward the facade, golden hour sunlight reflecting in the windows, natural street shadows and a little motion blur from passing pedestrians. Authentic influencer vibe like an Instagram story—unposed posture, one hand adjusting her tote strap, real urban background details (street sign, parked bikes, café entrance)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | ByteDance |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 16 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong photorealistic exterior renders with convincing lighting and material response (glass, concrete, metal, stone)
- High-detail outputs that help sell facade elements like mullions, cladding patterns, and landscaping accents
- Creative compositions for hero shots (street-level angles, dramatic skies, golden hour mood) that work well for marketing visuals
- Cost-efficient iteration at 4 credits per image, useful for rapid concept exploration and multiple viewpoints
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Robust image-to-image editing workflow for architectural revisions (swap materials, adjust facade rhythm, refine context) without restarting from scratch
- High-resolution output suited to exterior presentations where small features (window frames, signage, textures) need to read clearly
- Versatile style range for architectural visualization—from clean conceptual looks to more stylized or illustrative exterior studies
- Better fit for structured iteration cycles when stakeholders request targeted changes across multiple rounds
Verdict
If you want fast, photoreal exterior concepts and plenty of iterations per budget, Grok Imagine is the practical pick—especially for generating multiple facade options, angles, and mood variants at a low per-image cost.
If your workflow depends on precise edits and high-resolution deliverables—for example, revising a building skin, updating materials, or refining an existing render—Seedream 4.5 is often worth the higher credit cost, since it’s optimized for controlled adjustments and presentation-ready detail.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Seedream 4.5, and all our other AI models for architecture & exterior.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand