GPT-Image 1.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Eye-catching and expressive thumbnail imagery — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
YouTube thumbnails live or die on instant readability: bold subjects, clear emotions, high contrast, and a composition that still works at small sizes. In Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Z-Image Turbo both generate thumbnail-ready images from text prompts, but they optimize for different priorities.
GPT-Image 1.5 focuses on high-fidelity, detailed scenes with strong prompt adherence—useful when you need a very specific concept, consistent styling, or intricate props/backgrounds. Z-Image Turbo prioritizes ultra-fast, cost-effective generation and adds image-to-image plus LoRA support, making it a strong choice for rapid iteration and on-brand thumbnail templates.
YouTube Thumbnail — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Close-up YouTube thumbnail-style selfie of a 20s influencer with shoulder-length dark hair in a messy bun, wearing a bright oversized hoodie and simple hoop earrings, making an exaggerated shocked “OMG” face while holding an iced coffee up to the camera. Candid moment in a busy neighborhood café with bold colorful menu boards and people blurred in the background, dynamic off-center framing like a TikTok screenshot, looking right at the phone camera. Natural window lighting with high contrast and punchy colors, slight motion blur from the handheld phone for authentic UGC energy."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- High-fidelity results that hold up to thumbnail sharpening, contrast boosts, and cropping
- Strong prompt adherence for precise subject, emotion, pose, and composition requests
- Detailed scenes and props for story-driven thumbnails (before/after, challenges, comparisons)
- Versatile outputs that work across multiple thumbnail styles (cinematic, clean, illustrative)
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid thumbnail iteration and A/B concept exploration
- Flat per-image pricing (8 credits) that’s predictable for high-volume thumbnail workflows
- Image-to-image support to remix an existing thumbnail draft while preserving key layout cues
- LoRA support for brand-consistent characters, recurring series looks, or creator-specific styles
Verdict
If your thumbnail concept depends on exact prompt control, expressive detail, and a polished look straight out of generation, GPT-Image 1.5 is usually the better pick—especially for hero-subject close-ups, complex scenes, and “you must nail this idea” compositions.
If you value speed, predictable costs, and the ability to keep a consistent series style via LoRA (or iterate from an existing image), Z-Image Turbo is the more efficient thumbnail engine. Many creators use Z-Image Turbo for fast ideation and style consistency, then switch to GPT-Image 1.5 for the final, highest-impact render when needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for youtube thumbnail.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand

