GPT-Image 1.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Restaurant, cooking, and food styling content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Food photography lives or dies on texture, lighting, and styling details—think crisp crusts, glossy sauces, steam, and believable plating. In Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Z-Image Turbo both generate food imagery from text prompts, but they’re optimized for different priorities.
This comparison focuses on restaurant marketing shots, recipe step visuals, and styled hero images for menus and social content. We’ll look at how each model handles prompt adherence, detail fidelity, iteration speed, and cost when you’re producing consistent, appetizing food visuals at scale.
Food Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a cozy oversized cream sweatshirt holds her phone in one hand and looks toward the camera with a relaxed half-smile while leaning over a small kitchen island. In front of her is a beautifully plated avocado toast with a poached egg and chili flakes on a ceramic plate, styled with a linen napkin, gold fork, scattered microgreens, and a mug of coffee; shoot it as a dramatic 45-degree food hero shot with her face softly in the top corner of frame. Natural window light, slight handheld smartphone feel, real-life messy-counter details (cut lemon, crumbs) for an authentic TikTok/IG story vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- High-fidelity food detail: strong texture rendering for crust, crumbs, herbs, foam, and sauce sheen in hero shots
- Strong prompt adherence for precise plating directions (camera angle, lens feel, lighting, garnish placement, background props)
- Handles complex scenes well (multi-dish spreads, kitchen prep counters, restaurant table settings) with cohesive composition
- Versatile outputs for different food photography styles (editorial, rustic, minimal studio, moody restaurant lighting)
- Better choice when realism and micro-details matter for close-ups and menu-worthy imagery
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid ideation (many plating variations, color palettes, and backgrounds in minutes)
- Cost-effective and predictable pricing (8 credits per image) for high-volume restaurant and social batches
- Image-to-image support to refine an existing dish photo/mockup into new styles, angles, or lighting directions
- LoRA support for consistent brand styling (e.g., a signature plating look, tableware aesthetic, or restaurant vibe)
- Great for quick concepting of seasonal menus, promo banners, and content calendars
Verdict
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you need high-fidelity, appetizing realism—especially for close-up hero dishes, premium menu visuals, and detailed restaurant scenes where prompt accuracy and fine textures are non-negotiable.
Choose Z-Image Turbo when speed, iteration, and consistency workflows matter most. It’s a strong fit for rapid social content production, exploring many styling directions quickly, and maintaining a repeatable look via LoRA and image-to-image—while keeping per-image costs simple.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for food photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand