GPT-Image 1.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Close-up headshots and environmental portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right portrait model in Influencer Studio depends on what you prioritize: maximum realism and prompt precision, or rapid iteration with style control. GPT-Image 1.5 and Z-Image Turbo both handle close-up headshots and environmental portraits, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
Below is a portrait-focused comparison covering facial detail, skin texture, hair rendering, lighting, background integration, and how quickly you can explore looks—along with a clear view of credit costs for common portrait use cases.
Portrait — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Portrait photo of a mid-20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, dewy skin, wearing an oversized beige hoodie and simple gold hoops, holding her phone slightly above eye level like an Instagram story and looking just off-camera with a small, candid smile. She’s seated by a café window with a latte and an open laptop in the foreground, soft morning natural light on her face, shallow depth of field with warm bokeh from the street outside, 85mm lens feel. Authentic, relatable UGC vibe—slightly messy table, subtle motion blur in the background, not posed or editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- High-fidelity facial detail: strong skin texture, hair strands, and natural-looking lighting in close-up headshots
- Strong prompt adherence for portrait direction (pose, camera angle, lens feel, wardrobe, and scene cues)
- More reliable background-to-subject coherence for environmental portraits (subject separation, depth, and scene realism)
- Better handling of complex portrait prompts (multiple light sources, reflective materials, detailed styling notes)
- Flexible quality tiers (8/16/32 credits) to match draft vs final portrait needs
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid portrait iteration (quickly exploring expressions, outfits, and lighting setups)
- Cost-effective and predictable pricing at 8 credits per image for standard portrait outputs
- LoRA support for consistent portrait styling (e.g., editorial looks, film tones, brand aesthetics) across many images
- Image-to-image capability for refining an existing headshot or pushing a portrait into a new style while keeping composition
- Great for high-volume portrait batches (casting-style grids, social profile variants, campaign concepting)
Verdict
Pick GPT-Image 1.5 when portrait realism and prompt accuracy are the priority—especially for final headshots, beauty-style close-ups, and environmental portraits where lighting and background integration need to look intentional. Its higher-fidelity output tends to reward detailed direction and is well-suited for “deliverable-ready” portraits.
Pick Z-Image Turbo when speed, iteration, and style consistency matter most. For creators generating many portrait options, testing multiple looks, or applying a LoRA-driven aesthetic across a series, it’s a practical choice—particularly when standard quality is sufficient and you want consistent cost per image.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for portrait.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand