GPT-Image 1.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die on atmosphere: neon spill on wet asphalt, dense skyline parallax, holographic UI glow, and believable futuristic tech. In Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Z-Image Turbo both target text-to-image creation, but they prioritize different tradeoffs for these dystopian, high-detail scenes.
GPT-Image 1.5 focuses on high fidelity and strong prompt adherence—useful when you need complex compositions like layered street markets, signage-heavy alleys, and intricate tech props. Z-Image Turbo is built for speed and cost efficiency, with image-to-image and LoRA support that can help you iterate quickly or lock in a consistent cyberpunk look across a series.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s Asian woman with a chin-length black bob and clear-framed glasses, wearing a neon pink hoodie, black cargo pants, and chunky sneakers, holds her phone at arm’s length for a slightly imperfect selfie video, glancing near the camera mid-sentence with a casual half-smile. She’s under a ramen shop awning on a rain-slick cyberpunk street at night, surrounded by pink-blue-purple neon signage and drifting steam, with holographic ads reflecting in puddles behind her. Lit by phone screen glow plus nearby neon and streetlights, authentic TikTok “late-night snack run” vibe with a little motion blur and background pedestrians."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- High-fidelity neon cityscapes with dense micro-detail (signage, cables, reflections, layered architecture)
- Strong prompt adherence for complex sci-fi compositions (multiple subjects, specific gear, clear scene directives)
- More reliable handling of detailed scenes like crowded streets, cockpit interiors, and lab environments
- Versatile output quality settings (8/16/32 credits) to match concept vs final-render needs
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid cyberpunk moodboarding and high-volume iteration
- Cost-effective and predictable pricing (8 credits per image) for large batches of variations
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing neon scene, changing time-of-day, or pushing a dystopian grade
- LoRA support to maintain a consistent sci-fi aesthetic (e.g., a signature neon palette, armor style, or city branding) across a campaign
Verdict
If your priority is premium cyberpunk detail—crisp neon signage, complex futuristic tech, and scenes that closely follow intricate prompts—GPT-Image 1.5 is typically the better fit, especially at higher quality settings for final assets.
If you need speed, volume, and stylistic consistency across many outputs (or want to iterate from a base image), Z-Image Turbo is a strong choice for cyberpunk & sci-fi production workflows—particularly when LoRA-driven continuity matters more than maximum fidelity per frame.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand