GPT-Image 1.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Urban candid and city life documentation — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Street photography lives or dies on believable moments: natural light, authentic people, imperfect framing, and the layered chaos of city life. On Influencer Studio, GPT-Image 1.5 and Z-Image Turbo both generate street-style imagery from text prompts, but they prioritize different strengths.
GPT-Image 1.5 leans into high fidelity and tight prompt adherence—useful for complex urban scenes with specific subjects, locations, and atmosphere. Z-Image Turbo focuses on speed and cost predictability, adding image-to-image and LoRA support for rapid iteration and consistent street-series styling.
Street Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid 35mm street-photography-style shot of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark hair in a messy bun, wearing a thrifted oversized gray hoodie, bike shorts, and scuffed sneakers, holding an iced coffee and half-smiling while glancing toward the phone camera as if filming an Instagram story mid-walk. Set on a gritty city sidewalk outside a corner café with sticker-covered windows, rain-damp pavement, passing pedestrians blurred in the background, and subtle film grain with muted colors. Natural overcast daylight and soft ambient reflections from storefront glass, casual handheld framing like a real TikTok vlog moment."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- High-fidelity urban detail (signage, reflections, textures, crowds) for documentary-style city scenes
- Strong prompt adherence for precise direction (time of day, weather, lens feel, composition cues)
- Handles complex, layered street moments (multiple subjects, background action, depth) with fewer compromises
- More flexible quality tiers (8/16/32 credits) to match quick drafts vs hero images
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for exploring many candid variations (poses, gestures, street corners) in minutes
- Cost-effective and predictable pricing (8 credits per image) for high-volume street concepting
- Image-to-image support for refining an existing frame while preserving street composition and mood
- LoRA support for consistent city-series styling (e.g., gritty monochrome, neon-night, specific film looks)
Verdict
For street photography prompts that demand convincing realism and tightly controlled scene direction—like a specific transit stop at dusk with layered pedestrian action—GPT-Image 1.5 is typically the better pick, especially at medium/high quality when you need a “final” frame.
If your workflow is about speed, iteration, and building a cohesive street set (especially when you want to steer style via LoRA or refine frames with image-to-image), Z-Image Turbo is the practical choice. Many creators use Z-Image Turbo for rapid scouting and look development, then switch to GPT-Image 1.5 for the standout hero shots.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for street photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand