Flux Ultra 1.1 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Bridal, ceremony, and romantic couple shots — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Wedding photography demands more than “pretty pictures.” Bridal portraits need lifelike skin tones and fabric texture, ceremony shots need clean composition in challenging lighting, and couple portraits need emotion without awkward posing.
This comparison looks at how Flux Ultra 1.1 and GPT-Image 1.5 perform for wedding-focused image generation inside Influencer Studio—covering photorealism, prompt control, scene complexity, and how pricing maps to real wedding deliverables.
Wedding Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A late-20s woman with long wavy brown hair in a simple white slip dress and an oversized denim jacket holds her phone up for a mirror selfie, glancing toward the camera with a shy smile while her partner (late-20s man in a rolled-sleeve white button-down and tan chinos) adjusts a small bouquet behind her. They’re in a cozy apartment bedroom with an unmade bed, string lights, and a few wedding invite samples on the dresser—soft warm window light, dreamy bokeh in the background, candid “getting ready” vibe like an Instagram story. Natural, slightly imperfect framing from a phone camera, authentic and intimate rather than posed."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for bridal close-ups, with strong micro-detail in lace, beadwork, veils, and bouquet textures
- Premium-looking lighting and depth that can resemble high-end editorial wedding photography
- Ultra-high detail holds up well for full-resolution hero images (invites, website headers, album covers)
- Strong results for romantic couple portraits where natural skin rendering and realistic bokeh are priorities
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for specific wedding shot lists (e.g., “first kiss,” “ring exchange,” “recessional,” “golden hour couple walk”)
- Versatile output for varied wedding styles (classic church, modern rooftop, beach elopement, rustic barn) and composition requests
- Handles detailed scenes well—multiple people, décor, aisle florals, and venue context—when you need story-rich ceremony frames
- Flexible quality tiers (8/16/32 credits) to match the task: quick concepts vs. polished finals
Verdict
If your priority is premium photorealism and ultra-fine bridal detail—think hero bridal portraits, editorial couple shots, and high-end album cover imagery—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger “wow” option at a consistent 16 credits per image.
If you need reliable control and variety across a full wedding gallery (specific moments, venue-accurate scenes, different styles) and want to scale quality up or down by budget, GPT-Image 1.5 is often the better workflow choice—especially when prompt precision matters as much as realism.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for wedding photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand