Flux Ultra 1.1 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Epic fantasy scenes, magical characters, and mythical worlds — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Fantasy art lives or dies by atmosphere: cinematic lighting, believable materials, and characters that feel mythic rather than costumed. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and GPT-Image 1.5 both deliver high-quality text-to-image generation, but they shine in different parts of the fantasy pipeline—from hyper-detailed hero renders to tightly directed scene composition.
This comparison focuses on epic fantasy scenes, magical characters, and mythical worlds, with an eye on visual detail, prompt control, and cost per finished image. If you’re building key art for a campaign, concepting a world, or iterating on character looks, the differences below help you pick the right model (or the right quality tier) for the job.
Fantasy Art — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Fantasy art illustration in a casual phone-camera selfie vibe: a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a simple oversized hoodie and leggings holds her phone at arm’s length, looking slightly past the lens with a relaxed half-smile while standing in a small neighborhood café. Behind her, the latte bar glows with enchanted runes, a tiny dragon curls around a coffee grinder, and a misty portal shimmers near the pastry case, with warm natural window light mixing with dramatic magical glow effects. Candid, imperfect framing like an Instagram story, a few stray hairs and coffee steam visible, approachable everyday moment but set in an epic D&D-style enchanted café."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for armor, fabrics, skin texture, and intricate magical effects (runes, glow, particle work)
- Photoreal-leaning fantasy renders that make creatures, props, and environments feel tangible and cinematic
- Premium “hero image” output quality that works well for posters, covers, and high-impact thumbnails
- Strong performance on material realism (metal, leather, stone, fog, firelight) in dark, moody fantasy lighting
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for complex fantasy briefs (specific gear, poses, color palettes, shot types, and scene beats)
- Versatile output that handles both character-focused art and wide establishing shots of mythical worlds
- Quality tiers (low/medium/high) that support fast iteration during ideation and higher spend for final selects
- Reliable composition control for multi-element scenes (party lineup, battlefield staging, temple interiors, dragon scale sense)
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when your priority is premium visual richness—high-impact key art, close-up character portraits, and photoreal fantasy where materials and lighting need to feel expensive. At 16 credits per image, it’s a straightforward pick for final renders and showcase pieces.
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you need tighter direction from the prompt and flexible budgeting. Use low (8 credits) for rapid exploration of spells, outfits, and environment concepts, then step up to medium (16) or high (32) when you’re ready to lock composition and push fidelity for epic scenes.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for fantasy art.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand