Flux Ultra 1.1 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk and sci-fi visuals live or die on atmosphere: neon spill on wet pavement, dense city layering, believable futuristic materials, and coherent tech details. In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and GPT-Image 1.5 both target high-quality text-to-image generation, but they shine in different parts of the cyberpunk pipeline.
This comparison focuses on neon cityscapes, futuristic tech props, and dystopian storytelling. We’ll look at photorealism vs. prompt control, how each model handles complex scene density, and how pricing affects iteration when you’re dialing in a signature sci-fi look.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length teal-tinted hair and clear-frame glasses, wearing an oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and chunky sneakers, glancing just off-camera while holding a steaming takeaway coffee. She’s standing under a neon ramen shop awning on a rain-slick cyberpunk street with pink-blue-purple glow, holographic ads reflecting in puddles, and a few blurred pedestrians behind her like a real late-night TikTok story. Natural ambient city lighting from signage and streetlamps, slight motion blur, unpolished UGC vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for neon-lit environments (signage textures, rain sheen, reflections, grime and wear)
- Photorealistic rendering that sells dystopian street photography and cinematic sci-fi stills
- Premium-quality lighting and material realism for metals, glass, holographic surfaces, and wet asphalt
- Strong results when you want a “finished poster” look with minimal post-processing
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for complex cyberpunk briefs (specific wardrobe, props, camera angles, and scene constraints)
- Versatile output across styles—can pivot between gritty dystopia, sleek futurism, and illustrative sci-fi with clear direction
- Handles detailed scenes well, especially when you need multiple elements to appear as requested (vehicles, drones, signage, street clutter)
- Flexible credit tiers (8/16/32) to support fast iteration at low cost and upscale finals when ready
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when your priority is premium, photoreal cyberpunk—neon realism, rich textures, and high-impact “final frame” images at a consistent 16 credits per render.
Choose GPT-Image 1.5 when you need tighter prompt control and iterative exploration of dystopian concepts. Its tiered pricing makes it practical to draft in low, refine in medium, and reserve high for hero assets where precision and fidelity matter most.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand