Flux Ultra 1.1 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Product-only shots, flat lays, and unboxing — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for product photography on Influencer Studio often comes down to two priorities: how realistic the product looks (materials, reflections, micro-texture) and how reliably the model follows your brief (angles, background, props, and composition). Flux Ultra 1.1 and GPT-Image 1.5 both generate high-quality product visuals from text, but they excel in slightly different ways.
This comparison focuses on product-only hero shots, flat lays, and unboxing-style scenes—where clean edges, accurate branding placement, and consistent lighting can make or break a listing image, ad creative, or storefront carousel.
Product Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in an oversized gray hoodie and bike shorts holds a minimalist white skincare serum bottle close to the phone camera, looking slightly past the lens with a casual half-smile, like a TikTok “morning routine” clip. She’s standing in a bright kitchen by a window with natural daylight, but the product is isolated on a clean white background with dramatic studio lighting, crisp hard shadow, and high-end commercial sharpness (Apple-launch vibe) while she remains softly visible behind it in a candid, unpolished way. Phone-camera perspective, slight hand-held motion blur on her fingers, product perfectly in focus with premium highlights and clean reflections."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism for product-only hero shots, especially for materials like glass, metal, glossy plastics, and textured packaging
- Ultra-high detail rendering that helps with close-up crops (labels, embossing, stitching, knurling, and surface grain)
- Premium-looking lighting and reflections that can mimic studio setups (softboxes, rim light, specular highlights)
- Strong performance for clean, minimal backgrounds where the product must look “camera-captured” rather than illustrated
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for composition control (angle, framing, background color, prop placement, and negative instructions)
- Flexible quality tiers (low/medium/high) to match the task—fast ideation vs final assets—using 8/16/32 credits
- Reliable results for structured flat lays (grid layouts, consistent spacing, clear top-down direction)
- Versatile scene building for unboxing concepts (hands, tissue paper, inserts, and packaging components) when you need more narrative context
Verdict
If your priority is premium, photoreal product-only imagery with standout micro-detail—ideal for hero shots and high-end listings—Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick at 16 credits per image. It’s especially compelling when your creative needs to hold up under tight crops and crisp lighting.
If you need tighter control over instructions and the ability to scale cost by draft vs final quality, GPT-Image 1.5 is often the more flexible choice. Its tiered pricing (8/16/32 credits) can be efficient for iterating flat lays and unboxing variations before committing to high-fidelity finals.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for product photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand