Flux Ultra 1.1 vs GPT-Image 1.5
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for a dating profile photo is about more than sharpness—it’s about creating images that feel authentic, flattering, and approachable. In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and GPT-Image 1.5 both generate photorealistic portraits, but they differ in how they handle detail, direction, and consistency for “dating app-ready” results.
Below is a practical comparison focused on the things that matter for dating profiles: natural skin texture, friendly expressions, believable lighting, outfit realism, and how reliably you can steer the vibe (coffee shop candid, outdoor golden hour, smart-casual headshot) without drifting into overly polished or artificial-looking outputs.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile-style selfie of an attractive, approachable woman (mid-20s to early-30s) with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a cozy oversized cream sweater and high-waisted jeans, holding her phone slightly above eye level and looking near the camera with a warm, genuine smile. She’s standing on a tree-lined city street outside a small café, golden-hour natural light hitting her face, a takeaway coffee cup in her other hand, background softly busy with pedestrians and parked bikes. Shot like an Instagram story/UGC moment—realistic phone-camera look, natural colors, slight handheld imperfection, not posed or editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | GPT-Image 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | OpenAI |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Strict |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealistic detail that can make portraits look premium and camera-grade
- Strong results for close-up headshots (hair, eyes, skin texture) that read as high-end and flattering
- Great for “hero” profile images where crispness and realism are the priority
- Consistent premium look at a fixed cost (16 credits per image) for predictable budgeting
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for dialing in dating-photo specifics (expression, outfit, setting, framing)
- Versatile output across different dating app styles (candid lifestyle shots, indoor portraits, outdoor scenes)
- Resolution/quality flexibility with low/medium/high tiers (8/16/32 credits) to match experimentation vs final renders
- Reliable for detailed scenes that support approachability (natural environments, contextual backgrounds, activities)
Verdict
Pick Flux Ultra 1.1 when your top goal is a single standout dating profile image with a premium, ultra-photoreal finish—especially for crisp headshots and clean, flattering lighting. Its fixed 16-credit pricing is also straightforward when you know you want “final-quality” outputs.
Pick GPT-Image 1.5 when you want tighter control over the brief (friendly smile level, setting, wardrobe, camera angle) and the option to iterate cheaply at 8 credits before committing to a higher-quality render. For most users building a set of varied dating photos, its prompt-following and tiered pricing can be the more efficient workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, GPT-Image 1.5, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand