Flux 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
Versatile and licensable stock photo style — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Stock photography needs more than good-looking images: it demands versatile, broadly usable visuals with consistent realism, clean compositions, and minimal “AI tells” that can limit commercial usefulness. In Influencer Studio, Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro both target high-quality image generation, but they approach stock-ready output differently.
This comparison focuses on how each model performs for licensable stock-photo style work—everyday lifestyle scenes, product-on-white, business concepts, travel, food, and editorial-like compositions—plus practical considerations like text accuracy, resolution, and cost per deliverable.
Stock Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid-20s Black woman with shoulder-length natural curls, wearing a cozy oversized hoodie and leggings, holds a clear iced coffee up near her face and looks slightly past the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. Shot as a casual front-facing smartphone selfie at a bright neighborhood café table with a laptop and pastry in the background, clean composition and everyday clutter kept minimal. Soft natural window light, true-to-life skin texture, stock photography realism like a TikTok story thumbnail."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | 1K, 2K, 4K |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 22 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Strong image-to-image editing and style transfer for turning rough concepts into consistent stock-photo sets
- LoRA support for repeatable “house styles” (e.g., consistent lighting, brand-safe color palettes, or a specific studio look)
- Face-swap support can help maintain continuity across a series (useful for lookbook-style stock sets), when used with appropriate rights/consents
- Up to 4MP output balances detail and cost for many common stock use cases (web, social, small-to-mid print)
- Two pricing tiers (Standard vs Klein 9B) provide flexibility when iterating vs finalizing
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Industry-leading text rendering for stock-friendly use cases that include signage, packaging, labels, or posters
- Marketing-grade polish that often translates well to clean, commercial stock compositions
- Up to 4K resolution option for detail-heavy stock needs (cropping flexibility, larger-format placements)
- Multimodal understanding can improve prompt adherence when referencing an input image or concept direction
- Simple resolution-based pricing makes it easy to choose quality level per deliverable
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your stock workflow depends on editing, variations, and consistent series output—especially when you want to refine existing images, apply controlled style shifts, or standardize a repeatable look via LoRA. It’s a strong fit for building cohesive stock collections quickly and cost-effectively during iteration.
Choose Nano Banana Pro if your stock concepts frequently include readable text (storefronts, product labels, UI-like elements) or you need higher-resolution 4K deliverables with a more “finished” commercial sheen. It can be the better option for stock visuals that must hold up under close inspection and cropping.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for stock photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand