Flux 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
Business-appropriate professional portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
A strong LinkedIn profile photo needs more than “nice lighting.” It should look credible, business-appropriate, and consistent with your real appearance—clean background, natural skin texture, accurate facial features, and wardrobe that fits your industry.
This comparison looks at how Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro perform inside Influencer Studio for LinkedIn Professional Photo use cases: generating polished headshots, refining an existing portrait, keeping identity consistent, and producing high-resolution outputs suitable for profile and banner crops.
LinkedIn Professional Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 28–35-year-old woman with shoulder-length dark brown hair in a neat blowout, wearing a tailored navy blazer over a simple white tee, minimal jewelry, and natural makeup, looking slightly past the lens with an approachable confident smile. Shot in a real coworking space lounge with a neutral wall and soft daylight from a nearby window, one hand holding a coffee cup and the other holding the phone as if filming an Instagram story “heading into meetings” update. Natural professional lighting, realistic skin texture, subtle background blur, authentic LinkedIn-ready vibe without looking posed or editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | 1K, 2K, 4K |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 22 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Best choice for editing an existing portrait (image-to-image) to achieve a cleaner, more professional LinkedIn look
- LoRA support enables repeatable identity/style consistency across multiple headshots (useful for teams or personal brand sets)
- Versatile retouching and style transfer for controlled improvements (background cleanup, lighting direction, wardrobe adjustments)
- Up to 4MP output is typically sufficient for LinkedIn profile usage while keeping per-image costs predictable
- Face-swap support can help preserve recognizable facial structure when generating new variations (use with care for authenticity)
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Strong at producing marketing-grade, camera-ready portraits from text prompts with polished lighting and composition
- Excellent text rendering for on-image elements (e.g., subtle name/title overlays for profile banners or announcement graphics)
- Multimodal understanding can better follow nuanced brief constraints (industry vibe, dress code, background context) when inputs are provided
- Up to 4K resolution option supports heavier cropping and reuse across LinkedIn assets beyond the profile photo
- Consistent professional aesthetic for “studio headshot” style outputs when you don’t need deep editing workflows
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 if your priority is turning an existing photo into a LinkedIn-ready headshot—cleaner background, improved lighting, subtle retouching, and repeatable results across a set (especially with LoRA). It’s also a strong fit when you need controlled edits rather than a brand-new portrait.
Choose Nano Banana Pro if you want highly polished, production-quality portraits from prompts and you may also create LinkedIn visuals that include text (banners, hiring posts, event promos). For pure profile photos, it shines when you want a premium look and are willing to spend more credits for 4K outputs.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for linkedin professional photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand