Flux 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
Polished ad creative for social platforms — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro are both strong choices for creating polished social media ad creatives, but they shine in different parts of the workflow. Flux 2 leans into flexible iteration—editing, style transfer, face-swap, and LoRA-based customization—making it well-suited for teams that test many variants and need brand-consistent visuals.
Nano Banana Pro is built for production-ready outputs with standout text rendering and marketing-grade finish. If your ads rely on crisp headlines, offer callouts, or packaging copy inside the image, Nano Banana Pro is often the more dependable pick—especially when you want fewer iterations before shipping.
Social Media Ad — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a cozy oversized beige sweater and light-wash jeans holds up a sleek matte-white insulated water bottle with a visible logo, looking near the phone camera with a casual half-smile like she’s mid-sentence in a TikTok. Shot as a handheld front-facing selfie in a bright kitchen by a window, morning natural light, coffee mug and fruit bowl in the background, one hand twisting the bottle cap as if demonstrating it. Clean, aspirational everyday vibe with clear product placement, realistic phone-camera perspective and slightly imperfect framing."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | 1K, 2K, 4K |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 22 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Versatile image-to-image editing for fast ad iterations (swap backgrounds, adjust styling, refine compositions)
- LoRA support for repeatable brand looks and campaign consistency across multiple ad sets
- Face-swap support for creator-style ads and talent variations without reshooting
- Up to 4MP output suitable for most social placements and feed-first creatives
- Two pricing tiers (Standard and Klein 9B) for balancing quality vs. cost per variation
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Industry-leading text rendering for in-image headlines, price tags, promo codes, and disclaimers
- Marketing-grade finish that often needs fewer touch-ups for “ready-to-post” ad creatives
- Up to 4K resolution option for high-detail product ads and multi-placement repurposing
- Multimodal understanding supports tighter alignment to briefs when referencing visual inputs
- Straightforward 1K/2K pricing at 22 credits for cost-stable testing at common social sizes
Verdict
For social media ads where the image must carry clear, readable copy (headlines, offers, labels, CTA-style overlays), Nano Banana Pro is typically the safer choice—its text rendering and polished output reduce revisions and improve “ship-ready” consistency.
Flux 2 is the better fit when your ad pipeline depends on rapid creative iteration, brand-style customization via LoRA, and editing-heavy workflows (including face-swap). If you’re producing many variants for testing and need strong control over look-and-feel, Flux 2 can deliver excellent efficiency—especially on the lower-cost Klein 9B tier.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for social media ad.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand