Flux 2 vs Nano Banana Pro
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro are two strong options in Influencer Studio for creating 3D graphics—from CGI product shots and cinematic environments to stylized digital art that mimics real renders. Both can generate high-detail images from prompts, but they differ in how they handle iteration, text in-scene, and production workflows.
This comparison focuses on 3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art: how cleanly each model produces materials and lighting, how reliably it follows art direction, what resolution you can expect, and how pricing impacts high-volume rendering and marketing deliverables.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine), casual TikTok-style front camera selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, minimal makeup, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black leggings, holding an iced coffee and looking slightly past the lens with a candid half-smile. She’s seated by a café window with a messy table (laptop, earbuds, pastry wrapper), soft natural morning light spilling in with subtle volumetric rays, realistic skin subsurface scattering and physically-based fabric textures. Authentic UGC vibe, slight handheld phone perspective, imperfect framing and mild motion blur like an Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | 1K, 2K, 4K |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 22 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Versatile 3D iteration with text-to-image plus image-to-image editing for refining lighting, materials, and camera framing
- LoRA support for consistent 3D art direction (e.g., specific shader looks, studio lighting setups, or a recurring CGI style)
- Up to 4MP output suitable for detailed renders and close-up crops of products or characters
- Style transfer options that help match a target CGI aesthetic across a series
- Face-swap support when 3D scenes need a consistent hero face for campaigns or thumbnails
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Industry-leading text rendering for 3D scenes that include signage, packaging labels, UI panels, or title cards
- Marketing-grade polish that suits product CGI, ads, and thumbnails where clarity and cleanliness matter
- Up to 4K resolution option for high-detail deliverables and large-format exports
- Multimodal understanding that can improve alignment when working from reference imagery or mixed inputs
- Straightforward resolution tiers (1K/2K/4K) that map well to common production specs
Verdict
For 3D graphics workflows that require heavy iteration—like adjusting materials, relighting a CGI scene, or maintaining a consistent render style across a collection—Flux 2 stands out thanks to image editing and LoRA-based consistency. It’s a strong fit for creators who treat outputs like “render drafts” and refine them toward a final look.
If your 3D visuals must include crisp, readable text (packaging, signage, brand lockups) or you’re delivering marketing-ready creatives with minimal cleanup, Nano Banana Pro is often the safer choice—especially at 1K/2K where the credit cost is predictable. At 4K, factor in the higher credit spend for final exports.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand