Photorealistic Comparison

Flux 2 vs Nano Banana Pro

Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.

Full comparison

Compare Models (select 4)

2/4 selected

For photorealistic work—images that read as “shot on a camera,” not “made by AI”—the differences between models show up fast: skin texture, lens behavior, lighting continuity, and whether small details (logos, labels, signage) hold up at full resolution.

Flux 2 and Nano Banana Pro both target high-end visuals on Influencer Studio, but they approach realism differently. Flux 2 leans into flexible editing and customization (including LoRA support), while Nano Banana Pro prioritizes production-ready outputs and consistently accurate text rendering—often a deciding factor for commercial photo-style creatives.

Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results

Prompt

"Hyperrealistic photorealistic influencer-style photo: a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and minimal makeup, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black biker shorts, holding her phone at arm’s length for a casual front-camera selfie while glancing slightly off-lens with a half-smile. She’s in a small sunlit kitchen making iced coffee on a cluttered counter (oat milk carton, coffee grounds, sticky notes), natural morning window light with soft shadows and true-to-life skin texture and imperfections, DSLR-level realism. Candid, everyday vibe like an Instagram story frame, not posed or editorial."

Feature Comparison

FeatureFlux 2Nano Banana Pro
ProviderBlack Forest LabsGoogle (Gemini 3 Pro)
Subcategoriestext-to-image, image-to-imagetext-to-image
1080p / 2k ModeYesYes
4k ModeYesYes
NSFW RatingLowMedium
Aspect Ratio1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:31:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3
Model VariantStandard, Klein 9B1K, 2K, 4K
Starting Price22 credits22 credits

Flux 2 Strengths

  • Strong photorealistic editing workflow (image-to-image) for refining lighting, materials, and facial details without restarting
  • LoRA support enables consistent “same person / same product” realism across a series—useful for campaign continuity
  • Up to 4MP output helps preserve micro-detail (pores, fabric weave, fine reflections) for close-up, photo-like results
  • Versatile style transfer controls for dialing realism toward specific camera looks (studio flash, natural window light, golden hour)
  • Face-swap support can help maintain identity consistency in photoreal portrait pipelines (when used carefully)

Nano Banana Pro Strengths

  • Industry-leading text rendering for photoreal scenes with readable signage, packaging, UI screens, and labels
  • Marketing-grade, production-ready look that often needs fewer iterations to reach “client-safe” realism
  • Multimodal understanding improves prompt adherence when combining subject, setting, and brand constraints in realistic compositions
  • Up to 4K resolution option supports crisp, print-leaning photoreal outputs when you need maximum clarity
  • Consistent realism for product-and-lifestyle frames where small errors can break the photographic illusion

Verdict

If your definition of photorealistic includes editable realism—iterating on an existing image, matching a recurring subject, or building a consistent series—Flux 2 is typically the more flexible choice thanks to image-to-image controls and LoRA support.

If your photorealistic deliverable must include clean, readable text (packaging, storefronts, posters) and you want a high hit-rate for marketing-ready frames, Nano Banana Pro is often the safer pick—especially when 4K clarity and typography accuracy matter. Cost-wise, note that Nano Banana Pro’s 4K tier is priced higher per image, while Flux 2 pricing is consistent per image at its available quality levels.

Frequently Asked Questions

Try Both Models Free

Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.

Join Influencer Studio Today

Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand