Seedream 4.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Creating convincing vintage & retro visuals isn’t just about adding grain—it’s about getting period-accurate color response, believable texture, and the kind of “imperfect” details that sell nostalgia. On Influencer Studio, Seedream 4.5 and Z-Image Turbo both support text-to-image and image-to-image workflows, but they differ in how much control and refinement you get when chasing a classic film look.
This comparison focuses on film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters, including how well each model handles faded palettes, halation-like glow, soft focus, subtle noise patterns, and era styling. We’ll also weigh practical considerations like generation speed and credits per image.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid 90s disposable-camera style selfie of a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, wearing a slightly oversized vintage graphic tee and high-waisted light-wash jeans, holding an iced coffee and looking just past the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s standing in a cozy neighborhood café by a window with handwritten menu boards and mismatched chairs, captured in natural morning light with subtle motion blur like a real Instagram story. Warm nostalgic tones, faded colors, visible film grain, slight vignetting, and a soft light leak along one edge for an authentic analog feel."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Seedream 4.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- More consistent high-quality retro renders (clean composition with believable “aged” character like faded tones and soft contrast)
- Stronger image-to-image editing for dialing in nostalgia (adjusting grain intensity, color cast, vignette, and texture without fully changing the scene)
- High-resolution output that keeps vintage texture detailed (grain and paper-like artifacts remain readable instead of turning into mush)
- Versatile style range for multiple eras (e.g., 70s warm tones, 80s flash look, muted 90s print feel) with fewer prompt compromises
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid retro concepting (great for testing multiple nostalgic looks quickly)
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume vintage iterations and moodboard exploration
- LoRA support to lock in specific retro aesthetics (consistent “camera/film stock” vibes across a series)
- Solid standard-quality vintage outputs when prompts are clear (effective for simple grain + color-shift + vignette treatments)
Verdict
If your priority is premium vintage realism—film-like texture that holds up at higher resolution, plus dependable editing control to fine-tune grain, fading, and nostalgic color—Seedream 4.5 is the stronger choice, even at 16 credits/image.
If you need speed and volume—rapidly generating lots of retro variations, especially when you can lean on LoRA for a consistent nostalgic signature—Z-Image Turbo offers a compelling workflow at 8 credits/image. Many creators use Turbo for exploration and Seedream for final, polished retro selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Seedream 4.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand