Seedream 4.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Neon cityscapes, futuristic tech, and dystopian aesthetic — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Cyberpunk & sci-fi visuals live or die by atmosphere: neon haze, reflective rain-slick streets, dense signage, and believable near-future tech. On Influencer Studio, Seedream 4.5 and Z-Image Turbo both target these aesthetics, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
Seedream 4.5 prioritizes high-quality output and strong image editing, making it a solid choice for polishing complex neon cityscapes and refining futuristic details. Z-Image Turbo emphasizes ultra-fast generation and cost efficiency, ideal for rapid concepting, iteration, and LoRA-driven style consistency across a series.
Cyberpunk & Sci-Fi — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Early-20s influencer with shoulder-length black hair and subtle neon eyeliner, wearing an oversized hoodie, bike shorts, and chunky sneakers, holding a phone at arm’s length and glancing just past the lens like a quick IG story check-in. Standing under a dripping awning on a rain-slick neon street with pink-blue-purple holographic menu boards and passing hover-bikes behind them, steam rising from a takeout cup in hand. Shot on a front-facing phone camera with natural streetlight + glowing signage reflections, slightly messy hair and candid expression, realistic UGC vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Seedream 4.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Higher-fidelity cyberpunk scenes: cleaner neon gradients, sharper architecture edges, and more convincing rain/reflection effects
- Stronger editing workflow (image-to-image): easier to iterate on composition, signage placement, color palette, and character/gear tweaks without restarting
- High-resolution output that holds up for posters, thumbnails, and detailed futuristic UI/tech elements
- Versatile style range: shifts well between glossy neon-noir, gritty dystopia, and sleek sci-fi lab aesthetics
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid ideation: explore many neon cityscape layouts and lighting moods in minutes
- Lower cost per image (8 credits): better for high-volume iteration, storyboard frames, and A/B testing variations
- LoRA support for consistent cyberpunk “brand look” (e.g., specific neon signage language, armor silhouettes, or city motifs) across campaigns
- Strong for standard-quality outputs where speed matters more than micro-detail (social drafts, concept sheets, quick mood boards)
Verdict
If your priority is premium cyberpunk detail—crisp neon signage, believable futuristic materials, and the ability to refine dystopian scenes through edits—Seedream 4.5 is typically the better fit at 16 credits per image. It’s the choice for final renders and high-resolution deliverables.
If you need speed, volume, and consistent styling for a cyberpunk series—especially when leveraging LoRA for a repeatable neon-noir look—Z-Image Turbo is the practical pick at 8 credits per image. Many creators use it to generate fast variations, then switch to Seedream 4.5 for the “hero” selects and finishing passes.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Seedream 4.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for cyberpunk & sci-fi.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand