Seedream 4.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For photorealistic work—images that read like real camera captures—small differences in skin texture, lens behavior, lighting falloff, and micro-detail can make or break believability. Seedream 4.5 and Z-Image Turbo both create realistic visuals in Influencer Studio, but they optimize for different priorities.
Seedream 4.5 focuses on high-quality output and stronger editing workflows, while Z-Image Turbo emphasizes speed and cost efficiency (plus LoRA support) for rapid iteration. Below is a photorealism-first comparison covering realism, consistency, and practical production tradeoffs.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic DSLR-quality photo of a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and minimal makeup, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black biker shorts, holding her phone up for a mirror selfie while glancing slightly toward the camera with a relaxed, mid-laugh expression. She’s in a slightly messy bedroom “get ready with me” moment—unmade bed, open laptop, skincare bottles on the dresser, a hoodie tossed on a chair—captured in soft natural window light with realistic skin texture, tiny blemishes, and true-to-life shadows. Casual handheld framing like an Instagram story, a little motion blur in one hand, authentic and unposed rather than editorial."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Seedream 4.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Higher-end photoreal detail potential (skin pores, fabric weave, subtle specular highlights) for “camera-like” finishes
- Stronger image-to-image editing for refining realism (fixing facial details, adjusting lighting, correcting artifacts) without restarting
- High-resolution output that holds up better for close crops and product-style compositions
- More dependable results across varied photoreal scenarios (portraits, interiors, lifestyle, product) when quality is the priority
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast photoreal generation for rapid prompt iteration and concept exploration
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume testing, batch creation, and A/B prompt trials
- LoRA support to push a specific photoreal look (brand style, camera vibe, consistent subject cues) when you have the right LoRA
- Good “standard realism” for social-first deliverables where speed matters more than microscopic detail
Verdict
If your goal is hyperrealistic imagery that can pass as a photograph—especially for close-up portraits, premium product shots, or any output that will be scrutinized—Seedream 4.5 is typically the safer pick. Its higher quality ceiling and stronger editing tools make it easier to eliminate telltale AI artifacts and polish images into a truly photographic finish (at 16 credits per image).
If you need photoreal content at scale, fast turnaround, or lots of iterations to find the right composition, Z-Image Turbo is the practical workhorse. It’s faster and half the cost (8 credits), and LoRA support can help lock in a consistent photoreal style—though the final “indistinguishable from a photo” threshold may require more careful prompting, selective rerolls, or follow-up edits.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Seedream 4.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand