Seedream 4.5 vs Z-Image Turbo
Urban candid and city life documentation — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Street photography lives or dies on believable moments: natural light, authentic gestures, imperfect framing, and the visual noise of real cities. In Influencer Studio, both Seedream 4.5 and Z-Image Turbo can produce urban candid and city-life documentation—yet they prioritize different parts of the workflow.
Seedream 4.5 is built for high-quality output and strong image editing, making it a solid choice when you need refined realism, consistent series, or precise fixes. Z-Image Turbo focuses on ultra-fast, cost-effective generation with LoRA support, which is useful for rapid iteration, testing multiple locations/wardrobes, or matching a specific street-photography look.
Street Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid street-photography style shot of a 20s woman with shoulder-length dark hair in a messy bun, wearing a thrifted oversized gray hoodie, straight-leg jeans, and scuffed white sneakers, holding an iced coffee and glancing near the phone camera mid-walk like she’s filming an Instagram story. Set on a gritty city sidewalk outside a corner café with peeling posters, wet pavement, and passing pedestrians blurred in the background, documentary 35mm film vibe with grain and muted colors. Natural overcast daylight, casual handheld phone-camera framing, imperfect composition with motion blur and real urban textures."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Seedream 4.5 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 8 credits |
Seedream 4.5 Strengths
- Higher-fidelity street realism (skin texture, fabric, signage, reflections) for documentary-style city scenes
- Stronger image-to-image editing for cleanup and continuity (remove distractions, adjust framing, fix small artifacts)
- High-resolution output that holds up for crops (tight candid portraits, storefront details, layered street scenes)
- Versatile style control—from gritty night street to bright daytime editorial—without sacrificing overall clarity
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for exploring many candid moments, angles, and neighborhoods in a short time
- Lower cost per image (8 credits) for high-volume street-photography ideation and A/B testing
- LoRA support to lock in a recognizable street look (film grain, specific lens vibe, city-specific color palettes)
- Good baseline image-to-image for quick variations (pose tweaks, weather shifts, time-of-day changes)
Verdict
If your goal is street photography that reads as more “shot on the street” with convincing detail—and you expect to edit, refine, and deliver a cohesive set—Seedream 4.5 is typically the better fit, especially when you need high resolution and reliable touch-ups.
If you’re iterating quickly, generating lots of candidate frames, or building a repeatable street aesthetic with LoRAs while keeping credit spend low, Z-Image Turbo is the practical choice. Many creators use Z-Image Turbo for rapid scouting and then switch to Seedream 4.5 for final selects and polish.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Seedream 4.5, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for street photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand