Grok Imagine vs Nano Banana Pro
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Vintage & retro visuals live or die by the “analog illusion”: believable film grain, era-correct color response, subtle halation, and styling that feels pulled from a specific decade. On Influencer Studio, Grok Imagine and Nano Banana Pro both support text-to-image workflows, but they differ in how they handle nostalgic aesthetics and practical production needs.
Grok Imagine leans into creative composition and high-detail photorealism, which can be ideal for cinematic retro scenes and lifestyle shots with convincing texture. Nano Banana Pro is built for marketing-grade outputs, with standout text rendering and higher resolution options—useful when your “retro” concept includes poster typography, product labels, or ad-style layouts that must read cleanly.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair, wearing a vintage oversized denim jacket over a white tee and high-waisted mom jeans, holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie while glancing near the camera mid-laugh in a cozy corner café with a half-finished latte and a thrifted tote on the table. Natural window light, candid “checking in on my day” Instagram story vibe, subtle motion blur like a quick snap. Shot on a 90s disposable camera look: warm nostalgic tones, faded colors, visible film grain, light leak in one corner, tiny date stamp feel."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 22 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong creative compositions for cinematic retro scenes (street portraits, diners, neon nights) with convincing photorealistic detail
- Film-grain-friendly outputs: detailed textures (skin, fabric, paper) help grain and “analog noise” feel more natural
- Cost-efficient for exploration and iteration at 4 credits per image—handy when dialing in a specific decade look
- Solid image-to-image support for applying vintage treatments to an existing photo or refining a retro mood board
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Industry-leading text rendering—ideal for vintage posters, magazine covers, packaging, and ad layouts where typography must be legible
- Up to 4K output for print-like retro assets (posters, album covers, storefront signage) with crisp edges and fine detail
- Marketing-grade consistency: better suited to repeatable “retro campaign” variations and brand-ready deliverables
- Multimodal understanding supports more controlled iterations when referencing an input image for a specific nostalgic style direction
Verdict
If your priority is authentic-looking retro photography—moody lighting, cinematic framing, and tactile textures that make film grain feel believable—Grok Imagine is the more cost-effective choice for rapid iteration and creative exploration.
If your vintage concept includes readable typography, poster design, packaging, or high-resolution deliverables, Nano Banana Pro is the stronger production pick—especially when you need 2K/4K outputs and dependable text-on-image accuracy, even at a higher credit cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand