Grok Imagine vs Nano Banana Pro
Close-up headshots and environmental portraits — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for portraits comes down to how well it handles faces: natural skin texture, believable lighting, accurate anatomy, and consistent identity across variations. For environmental portraits, it also needs to balance subject clarity with background storytelling—without muddying detail or over-stylizing features.
This page compares Grok Imagine and Nano Banana Pro specifically for close-up headshots and environmental portraits on Influencer Studio, including quality, control, text handling for portrait creatives, and pricing for common deliverables (social crops vs 4K).
Portrait — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Portrait photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a loose beige knit sweater and high-waisted jeans, holding an iced latte and glancing toward the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile like an Instagram story. Shot in a cozy neighborhood café by a window with natural daylight, shallow depth of field and warm bokeh from background lights, 85mm lens feel with crisp focus on her face. Candid, mid-sip moment with one elbow on the table, minimal makeup, slightly messy hair, authentic UGC vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 22 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong photorealistic portrait output with high facial detail (skin, hair, and lighting nuance)
- Excels at creative portrait concepts and stylized editorial looks while keeping images cohesive
- Flexible for both text-to-image and image-to-image portrait workflows (reference-based iterations, re-styling, variations)
- Good at complex compositions for environmental portraits (subject + scene) with a cinematic feel
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Marketing-grade portrait polish with reliable, production-ready clarity—especially at higher resolutions
- Industry-leading text rendering for portrait ads (headlines on posters, signage in scenes, lower-thirds style overlays)
- Up to 4K output for close crops, print-ish use cases, and detail-heavy beauty/headshot work
- Strong multimodal understanding for refining portraits from references (e.g., adjusting wardrobe, background, or mood while keeping intent)
Verdict
Pick Grok Imagine if your portrait work prioritizes creative direction, cinematic mood, and high-detail photorealism at a lower per-image cost. It’s a strong choice for generating lots of headshot variations, testing styling ideas, or building environmental portraits with more artistic range.
Pick Nano Banana Pro if you need production-ready portrait assets—especially at 2K/4K—or if your portraits must include readable text elements (campaign lines, signage, packaging, posters) without rework. It’s typically the better fit for ad creatives and final deliverables where resolution and text accuracy matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for portrait.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand