Grok Imagine vs Nano Banana Pro
3D renders, CGI scenes, and digital art — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Looking to generate polished 3D graphics inside Influencer Studio—think CGI product shots, stylized renders, and cinematic scene concepts? Grok Imagine and Nano Banana Pro both handle text-to-image workflows well, but they shine in different parts of the 3D pipeline.
This comparison focuses on what matters for 3D: material realism, lighting consistency, geometry-like detail, scene composition, and how well each model supports production needs like readable labels, signage, and high-resolution exports.
3D Graphics — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Photorealistic 3D render (Blender/Unreal Engine), casual front-facing phone selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair in a cozy café, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and simple gold hoops, holding an iced latte near her chin while looking slightly past the camera with a relaxed half-smile. Candid “morning check-in” vibe with a messy tote bag on the table, pastry crumbs, and street reflections in the window behind her; natural window light with soft volumetric rays, subsurface scattering on skin, and physically-based materials on the glass cup and knit fabric. Shallow depth of field, slight handheld tilt like an Instagram story frame, authentic and unpolished (tiny flyaway hairs, light under-eye shadows)."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 22 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong creative range for concept-style 3D renders and imaginative CGI compositions
- High perceived detail that helps sell materials (metal, plastic, glass) and surface texture
- Good photoreal-leaning output for cinematic lighting and dramatic scene setups
- Cost-efficient per image (4 credits) for rapid iteration during look development
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Marketing-grade polish for product-like 3D visuals and clean commercial CGI
- Industry-leading text rendering for labels, packaging, UI panels, signage, and decals in-scene
- Up to 4K output for sharper edges, cleaner gradients, and more usable crops in design workflows
- Multimodal understanding for refining 3D-style results based on a reference image or mixed inputs
Verdict
Choose Grok Imagine when you want fast, cost-effective exploration of 3D concepts—mood, lighting ideas, stylized CGI scenes, and high-detail creative directions. It’s a strong option for generating lots of variations before you lock a final look.
Choose Nano Banana Pro when your 3D graphics must be client-ready: crisp typography on assets, packaging-style accuracy, and high-resolution deliverables up to 4K. If your scene includes readable text (brands, labels, posters, UI) or you need export-grade sharpness, it’s typically the safer bet.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for 3d graphics.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand