Grok Imagine vs Nano Banana Pro
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
For photorealistic work, the difference between a “good render” and a truly believable photo often comes down to skin texture, natural lighting, lens behavior, and how well small details hold up under scrutiny. Grok Imagine and Nano Banana Pro both target high-fidelity realism, but they excel in slightly different parts of the photorealistic workflow.
Below is a practical, photography-first comparison focused on hyperrealistic results: how convincing people and products look, how reliably you can control the scene, and how well outputs stay sharp and artifact-free—especially when you need marketing-ready images.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic DSLR-style photo of a 23–30-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair and light freckles, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black leggings, holding her phone up for a mirror selfie while glancing near the camera with a relaxed half-smile. She’s in a slightly messy bedroom “get ready with me” moment (unmade bed, open closet, skincare bottles on a dresser), one hand adjusting her hair, captured with natural window light and realistic shadows, skin texture, and small imperfections. Candid, approachable Instagram-story vibe with true-to-life colors and phone-camera framing."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 22 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Strong photorealistic detail for people, environments, and objects with naturally complex textures (skin, hair, fabric, foliage)
- Creative scene-building that still reads as realistic—useful for cinematic, editorial, or lifestyle “shot on location” looks
- High-detail outputs that often preserve micro-contrast and material separation (metal vs plastic vs glass) for believable surfaces
- Cost-efficient per image (4 credits) for rapid iteration when dialing in a photoreal prompt
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Marketing-grade photorealism with strong prompt understanding for product, brand, and campaign-style compositions
- Industry-leading text rendering for realistic signage, packaging, labels, UI screens, and typography within the scene
- Up to 4K output for sharper, print-friendly photoreal results and better retention of fine details (pores, stitching, grain)
- Multimodal understanding that can improve accuracy when referencing or aligning to provided visual context
- Predictable production workflow pricing by resolution (22 credits for 1K/2K; 44 credits for 4K)
Verdict
If you want photorealistic images with strong creative range and you plan to iterate a lot to find the perfect “real photo” moment, Grok Imagine is a compelling choice—especially given its straightforward per-image cost. It’s well-suited to lifestyle realism, cinematic lighting, and varied compositions where you still need the result to feel authentic.
If your definition of photorealism includes usable text in-scene (packaging, storefronts, posters) and you need reliable, high-resolution outputs for production, Nano Banana Pro is typically the better fit. Its 4K option and text accuracy make it particularly strong for commercial, brand, and product photorealism where details must hold up close.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand