Grok Imagine vs Z-Image Turbo
Product-only shots, flat lays, and unboxing — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Product photography on Influencer Studio lives or dies by consistency: accurate materials, clean edges, believable lighting, and repeatable angles across a full SKU lineup. Whether you’re creating product-only hero shots, styled flat lays, or unboxing sequences, the right model should minimize artifacts while keeping branding details stable.
This comparison looks at Grok Imagine and Z-Image Turbo specifically for product-focused outputs—how well they handle photorealism, packaging fidelity, prop styling, and iteration speed—plus what their per-image credit cost means in day-to-day production.
Product Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in an oversized gray hoodie and black leggings holds a sleek matte-black skincare serum bottle up near her face, glancing toward the phone camera with a casual half-smile like she’s filming an Instagram story in her small kitchen. Shot on a smartphone at arm’s length in natural window light, with the product isolated on a clean white background beside her hand (no clutter), dramatic studio-style lighting on the bottle, crisp sharp shadow, high-end commercial product-launch feel while she remains candid and everyday."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 8 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Stronger photorealistic rendering for hero product shots (materials, reflections, and lighting feel more premium)
- High-detail output that helps with small packaging elements like labels, textures, and subtle surface finishes
- Better creative composition control for elevated flat lays (balanced arrangements, more polished scene styling)
- More reliable results when pushing for “studio look” consistency across angles (front/3/4/top-down) with image-to-image guidance
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid iteration on flat lay layouts, background colors, and prop variations
- LoRA support for repeatable brand styling (e.g., consistent packaging look, seasonal themes, or signature backdrops)
- Good fit for high-volume production where speed matters (bulk variations, multiple colorways, quick A/B concepts)
- Cost-effective in workflow time even if each image uses more credits—useful when deadlines are tight
- Solid standard-quality outputs for unboxing concept frames and storyboard-style sequences
Verdict
If your priority is premium-looking product-only hero shots—clean edges, convincing materials, and a more “high-end studio” finish—Grok Imagine is typically the better pick, and it’s also cheaper per image (4 credits) for quality-first deliverables.
If you need speed, lots of variations, or you want to lock in a consistent brand style via LoRA for repeatable campaigns, Z-Image Turbo is the more practical choice—even at 8 credits per image—because it can accelerate iteration and style standardization for flat lays and unboxing sequences.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for product photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand