Grok Imagine vs Z-Image Turbo
Top-down arranged compositions and aesthetic product flat lays — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flat lay content lives or dies by top-down geometry: clean spacing, believable shadows, consistent materials, and a cohesive styling story. In Influencer Studio, Grok Imagine and Z-Image Turbo both support text-to-image and image-to-image, but they tend to excel in different parts of the flat lay workflow.
Below is a focused comparison for creating aesthetic, arranged compositions—product lineups, desk setups, skincare routines, recipe ingredient spreads, and editorial-style layouts—covering realism, control, iteration speed, and how reliably each model holds a layout together across variations.
Flat Lay — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Top-down flat lay on a small café table: a woman in her mid‑20s with shoulder-length wavy brown hair and a cozy oatmeal sweater leans into the frame from the edge, looking up toward the phone camera with a relaxed half-smile, one hand holding an iced latte. A balanced arrangement of a croissant on a ceramic plate, lipstick, keys, notebook with scribbles, sunglasses, and an iPhone showing an Instagram story draft on a clean marble surface. Soft natural window light, casual candid vibe like a real TikTok “coffee + planning my day” post."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 8 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Stronger photorealistic flat lays with convincing top-down lighting, contact shadows, and material texture (paper, fabric, glass, metal)
- High detail rendering that helps small props read clearly (labels, packaging edges, stitching, grain, subtle reflections)
- Creative composition support for editorial flat lay concepts (themed color stories, layered props, intentional negative space)
- More robust results when you need premium-looking hero images for ads, product pages, or campaign key visuals
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast flat lay iteration for testing multiple layouts, color palettes, and prop combinations quickly
- LoRA support for maintaining a consistent brand style across flat lay sets (e.g., recurring backgrounds, prop aesthetics, packaging look)
- Cost-effective for bulk generation when you need many variations (seasonal sets, A/B concepts, content calendars)
- Good baseline quality for standard top-down compositions, especially when prompts are simple and well-structured
Verdict
If your flat lay needs premium realism and richly textured top-down detail—especially for hero assets—Grok Imagine is typically the better fit, and it’s also cheaper per image (4 credits) for high-end results.
If your priority is speed, style repeatability via LoRA, and producing lots of flat lay variations quickly, Z-Image Turbo is the practical choice—even at 8 credits per image—because it can reduce time-to-approval for high-volume workflows.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for flat lay.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand