Grok Imagine vs Z-Image Turbo
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Beauty content lives and dies by detail: skin texture that looks natural, makeup placement that matches facial anatomy, and lighting that flatters without turning everything into plastic. On Influencer Studio, Grok Imagine and Z-Image Turbo both support text-to-image and image-to-image workflows, making them strong options for skincare visuals, makeup look concepts, and product-focused creatives.
This comparison breaks down how each model performs for common beauty use cases—clean skincare ads, glam looks, editorial close-ups, shade/finish variations, and consistent brand styling—so you can pick the right tool for your content goals and turnaround time.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A mid‑20s woman with long dark wavy hair in a loose claw clip, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and minimal jewelry, holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual front-camera selfie while dabbing concealer under one eye and blending with a damp sponge. She’s standing at a small bedroom vanity with a few skincare bottles and a cream blush compact neatly arranged, dewy flawless skin catching a soft ring-light glow mixed with morning window light, looking just past the lens like she’s filming a quick “get ready with me” TikTok. Background feels real and lived-in: unmade bed, a mug on the nightstand, and a towel draped over a chair, nothing overly polished."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 8 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Photorealistic beauty close-ups with strong micro-detail (skin, pores, highlight, lip texture) for premium skincare and makeup visuals
- Creative compositions for editorial beauty concepts (dramatic lighting, stylized sets, bold color stories) while keeping a high-end finish
- High-detail rendering that helps products, packaging, and reflective surfaces look more believable in hero shots
- Strong image-to-image for refining an existing portrait or look concept into a more polished, campaign-ready result
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid iteration on makeup looks, colorways, and pose/lighting variations during concepting
- LoRA support to lock in a consistent beauty style (e.g., clean-glow skincare aesthetic, K-beauty softness, editorial matte) across a series
- Cost-effective for high-volume testing—useful when you need many drafts before selecting final looks
- Solid standard-quality outputs for social-first content where speed and consistency matter more than extreme photoreal detail
Verdict
If your Beauty & Makeup content needs premium realism—close-up skincare, high-end foundation finish, believable lashes/brows, and polished campaign imagery—Grok Imagine is typically the better fit thanks to its high-detail, photoreal output at 4 credits/image.
If your priority is speed, batch exploration, and maintaining a repeatable brand look via LoRA—especially for social series, shade explorations, and quick concept rounds—Z-Image Turbo is a strong choice, even at 8 credits/image, because it can save time through faster iteration and style consistency.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand