Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Nano Banana Pro
Corporate and professional headshot photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Flux Ultra 1.1 and Nano Banana Pro are both strong choices in Influencer Studio for creating corporate-ready professional headshots, but they excel in different ways. Flux Ultra 1.1 is geared toward premium photorealism and ultra-fine detail, while Nano Banana Pro focuses on production-grade output, higher resolution options, and reliable text handling for brand-adjacent assets.
This comparison looks specifically at professional headshot needs—natural skin texture, believable lighting, wardrobe realism, clean backgrounds, consistent identity across variations, and outputs suitable for LinkedIn, company directories, speaker pages, and press kits.
Professional Headshot — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s–30s influencer with shoulder-length dark hair in a simple smart-casual outfit (neutral crewneck sweater and blazer) holds a phone at arm’s length and looks near the camera with a relaxed, confident half-smile, like a quick “before my meeting” story. Shot against a clean light-grey wall with minimal shadows, subtle studio-style soft lighting but still phone-camera perspective, natural skin texture and realistic details. Framing is a straightforward head-and-shoulders professional headshot (LinkedIn vibe) with an everyday candid feel, no heavy retouching, no editorial styling."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 22 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism and micro-detail that helps headshots look camera-captured rather than stylized
- Strong skin texture, hair detail, and subtle lighting gradients suited to corporate portrait aesthetics
- Premium-quality rendering that holds up well for tight crops (face/shoulders) and profile images
- Great for “studio look” prompts (softbox lighting, neutral backdrops) where realism is the priority
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Flexible output sizing up to 4K, useful for press kits, speaker pages, and larger web placements
- Production-oriented consistency for clean, marketing-grade portraits with controlled backgrounds
- Industry-leading text rendering for companion assets (nameplates, event banners, team page headers) that may sit alongside headshots
- Multimodal understanding can help when iterating from an input image or reference to refine pose, wardrobe, or background direction
Verdict
Choose Flux Ultra 1.1 when the priority is premium, photorealistic headshots with standout facial detail and natural studio lighting—especially for tight corporate crops where realism is scrutinized.
Choose Nano Banana Pro when you need higher-resolution deliverables (up to 4K), reliable production consistency, or headshots that will be used alongside branded layouts where accurate text rendering and marketing-ready output matter. On pricing, Flux Ultra 1.1 is a straightforward 16 credits per image, while Nano Banana Pro scales with resolution (22 credits up to 2K, 44 credits at 4K).
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for professional headshot.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand