Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Nano Banana Pro
Runway, editorial, and outfit-of-the-day content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Fashion photography lives and dies on fabric realism, flattering lighting, accurate silhouettes, and styling details that hold up under close inspection. On Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Nano Banana Pro both target premium, photoreal results—but they excel in different parts of the runway-to-OOTD workflow.
This comparison focuses on runway looks, editorial spreads, and outfit-of-the-day content: how well each model handles garment texture, skin and hair realism, accessories, brand-safe typography (for mock ads and magazine-style layouts), and output resolution versus cost.
Fashion Photography — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length dark wavy hair, minimal makeup, wearing a relaxed white tee, high-waisted straight-leg jeans, and worn-in sneakers holds her phone slightly above eye level for a casual selfie video, glancing near the camera mid-laugh. She’s in a sunlit neighborhood café by the window with a half-finished iced latte and tote bag on the table, natural daylight casting soft shadows and a little motion blur like a real TikTok story. Shot on a phone-camera look (slight wide-angle), unpolished and approachable, candid everyday vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 22 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional micro-detail for fabrics (weaves, knits, leather grain) and accessories, making close-crop editorial shots feel premium
- Strong photorealism for skin, hair, and lighting—useful for runway-style full-body frames and beauty-forward editorials
- High-end overall image fidelity that supports luxury styling cues (tailoring lines, stitching, jewelry reflections)
- Great for “camera-like” outputs where you want the image to stand alone without added graphic design elements
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Industry-leading text rendering for fashion use cases like magazine covers, lookbook headers, price tags, and campaign mockups
- Up to 4K output for sharp e-commerce-style crops, print-ready editorials, and high-resolution OOTD posts
- Multimodal understanding to better align results to reference inputs (e.g., a specific outfit photo or moodboard) when building consistent series
- Marketing-grade consistency for branded layouts that combine product, model, and on-image typography
Verdict
If your priority is pure photoreal fashion imagery—fabric texture, couture-level detail, and editorial lighting—Flux Ultra 1.1 is typically the stronger pick per image, especially for close-ups and premium runway frames.
If your workflow includes fashion marketing assets (magazine-style covers, lookbooks, campaign posters) or you need high-resolution exports with reliable typography, Nano Banana Pro is the better fit—particularly at 4K when you need maximum sharpness and layout-ready text.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for fashion photography.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand