Flux Ultra 1.1 vs Nano Banana Pro
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right model for dating profile photos is about more than sharpness—it’s about looking attractive, approachable, and authentically “you.” In Influencer Studio, Flux Ultra 1.1 and Nano Banana Pro both generate premium, photorealistic dating-app-ready images, but they excel in different parts of the workflow.
Below is a practical comparison focused on the needs of dating profiles: natural skin texture, flattering lighting, believable environments, outfit styling, and the subtle details that make a photo feel candid rather than staged.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile selfie of a 25–30-year-old woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair, minimal makeup, and a warm smile, wearing a simple white tee and light-wash jeans with a crossbody bag. She’s standing on a sunny city sidewalk outside a cozy café, holding the phone slightly above eye level and looking just near the camera like she’s mid-laugh, with natural golden-hour lighting and a softly busy street background. The vibe feels like a real Instagram story frame—approachable, unposed, everyday."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux Ultra 1.1 | Nano Banana Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | Yes |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3, 21:9 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 16 credits | 22 credits |
Flux Ultra 1.1 Strengths
- Exceptional photorealism with ultra-high detail that helps portraits feel like real camera shots
- Strong at natural-looking skin texture, hair detail, and lifelike lighting—key for “approachable” vibes
- Premium portrait aesthetics for close-ups and half-body shots that read well on dating apps
- Cost-effective per-image pricing (16 credits) for iterating multiple looks, outfits, and locations
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Supports up to 4K output for crisp crops (face, torso, full-body) without losing clarity
- Multimodal understanding can better follow nuanced prompts about pose, setting, and styling consistency
- Industry-leading text rendering when you need readable elements (e.g., a café sign, event badge, or subtle background text) without visual glitches
- Flexible resolution-based pricing for different dating app needs (1K/2K at 22 credits; 4K at 44 credits)
Verdict
Flux Ultra 1.1 is the stronger pick if your top priority is premium photorealistic portrait detail at a lower per-image cost—great for generating multiple natural, flattering dating profile options quickly.
Nano Banana Pro is the better fit when you want higher-resolution deliverables (especially 4K for cropping) and more reliable handling of scenes with readable text or complex, multi-part instructions. For many users, the ideal approach is: generate your best “main” portrait candidates in Flux Ultra 1.1, then use Nano Banana Pro when you need a high-res hero image or a more structured scene.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux Ultra 1.1, Nano Banana Pro, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand