Reve vs Z-Image Turbo
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Vintage & retro visuals live or die on the small details: believable film grain, era-accurate color shifts, gentle halation, and typography that feels pulled from a poster archive. On Influencer Studio, both Reve and Z-Image Turbo can produce nostalgic looks from text prompts, but they prioritize different strengths.
Reve leans into polished aesthetics and reliable text rendering—useful for retro ads, album covers, and postcard-style designs where the lettering must be readable. Z-Image Turbo focuses on speed and flexibility (including image-to-image and LoRA support), making it a strong option for iterating quickly on film-grain treatments and trying multiple retro “filter” directions at the same cost per image.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair in a faded band tee and high-waisted light-wash jeans holds her phone up for a casual mirror selfie, looking slightly past the camera with a half-smile while she adjusts her tote bag strap. Cozy, slightly messy bedroom with a thrifted lamp and posters on the wall, morning window light spilling in, captured with a 90s disposable-camera vibe—film grain, faded colors, warm nostalgic tone, subtle light leak and timestamp in the corner."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Reve | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reve | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Medium | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
Reve Strengths
- Stronger aesthetic cohesion for retro poster, album-cover, and editorial-style compositions
- More dependable retro typography and readable on-image text (titles, dates, labels, signage)
- Consistent nostalgic color grading (warm fades, muted palettes) with fewer prompt tweaks
- Clean creative direction for “designed” vintage looks (print ads, postcards, magazine covers)
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid exploration of film grain intensity and nostalgic filter variants
- Image-to-image support for converting modern photos into retro looks while preserving structure
- LoRA support to steer toward specific eras/styles (e.g., 70s travel posters, 90s disposable-camera feel)
- Cost-effective iteration at the same 8 credits/image—great when you need many drafts quickly
- Efficient for batch workflows (multiple seeds, quick A/B testing of grain and color shifts)
Verdict
If your Vintage & Retro content depends on polished art direction and especially accurate, readable retro text (album titles, product labels, poster copy), Reve is typically the safer pick for fewer re-rolls and cleaner “finished” designs.
If you prioritize speed, iteration, and controllability—or you want to apply nostalgic treatments via image-to-image and fine-tune with LoRA—Z-Image Turbo is the better fit for high-volume experimentation with film grain and retro filter looks. Both cost 8 credits per image, so the decision mostly comes down to your need for text fidelity vs. workflow flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Reve, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand