Reve vs Z-Image Turbo
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Reve and Z-Image Turbo both generate images from text on Influencer Studio at the same price point (8 credits per image), but they approach photorealism differently. For creators chasing hyperrealistic results that read as “shot on camera,” the differences show up in skin texture, lighting fidelity, natural detail, and how reliably the model follows a photographic prompt.
Reve leans into refined aesthetics and strong text rendering, which can help when you need photorealistic scenes that also include legible signage, packaging, or on-image typography. Z-Image Turbo prioritizes ultra-fast generation and offers image-to-image plus LoRA support—useful when photorealism depends on matching a specific look, product, or identity across variations.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic DSLR-quality photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark hair and light freckles, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and bike shorts, holding a phone at arm’s length for a casual front-camera selfie while glancing near the lens with a relaxed half-smile. She’s standing in a slightly messy bedroom beside an unmade bed and a full-length mirror with clothes on a chair, one hand adjusting her hair like a “get ready with me” moment. Soft natural window light with realistic skin texture and minor blemishes, true-to-life indoor shadows and color, candid Instagram story vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Reve | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Reve | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Medium | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
Reve Strengths
- Polished, high-aesthetic outputs that can translate into premium-looking photorealistic portraits and lifestyle scenes
- More reliable in-image text rendering (e.g., labels, signs, packaging) when photorealism includes readable typography
- Strong prompt adherence for stylized-yet-real compositions, helping scenes feel intentionally art-directed rather than random
- Great for creative photoreal campaigns where realism and design sensibility both matter (editorial, ads, social hero images)
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid photoreal iterations (pose, lighting, wardrobe, background) without long wait times
- Image-to-image support to preserve structure and realism from a reference, useful for consistent “photo shoot” variations
- LoRA support for dialing in a specific photoreal look (e.g., consistent subject, product aesthetic, or brand vibe)
- Cost-effective workflow at the same 8 credits per image when you need higher volume photoreal testing and batching
- Practical for standard-quality photoreal outputs where speed and consistency tools matter more than maximum polish
Verdict
If your definition of photorealism is “looks like a high-end photo,” Reve is often the better first pick—especially for hero images where natural lighting, pleasing composition, and clean details matter, and where readable text may appear in-frame.
If you need photoreal results at scale, want to iterate quickly, or rely on reference-driven realism and customization, Z-Image Turbo is the more production-oriented choice thanks to its speed, image-to-image workflow, and LoRA support.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Reve, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand