Nano Banana Pro vs Reve
Hyperrealistic renders indistinguishable from photographs — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
When “photorealistic” means indistinguishable from a real photograph, small differences in texture fidelity, lighting behavior, and text accuracy become obvious—especially in close-ups, product shots, and lifestyle scenes. Nano Banana Pro and Reve are both strong options in Influencer Studio, but they emphasize different strengths for hyperreal work.
Below is a focused comparison for photorealistic output: realism under scrutiny (skin, fabric, metal, glass), consistency across variations, and how reliably each model handles real-world typography like labels, packaging, signage, and UI elements.
Photorealistic — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Hyperrealistic DSLR-quality photo of a 22–28-year-old woman with shoulder-length dark brown hair in a messy bun, minimal makeup and natural skin texture, wearing an oversized gray hoodie and black biker shorts, holding a to-go iced coffee and glancing toward the phone camera with a half-smile like she just hit record. Candid handheld selfie in a small neighborhood café by a window, background softly busy with pastries and laptops, slightly imperfect framing like an Instagram story. Natural morning window light with realistic reflections and accurate light falloff, no editorial posing, authentic UGC vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Nano Banana Pro | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google (Gemini 3 Pro) | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Medium | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Resolution | 1K, 2K, 4K | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Nano Banana Pro Strengths
- Higher ceiling for photoreal detail with up to 4K output, helping preserve micro-textures (skin pores, fabric weave, fine product materials)
- Industry-leading text rendering for photoreal scenes that include packaging, signage, labels, or on-image marketing copy
- Multimodal understanding supports more faithful results when you need the model to follow complex, real-world constraints and context
- Marketing-grade, production-oriented output that suits photoreal product, brand, and campaign imagery
- Flexible resolution pricing (1K/2K same cost) makes it practical to iterate before committing to 4K finals
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic polish that can make photoreal images feel art-directed and visually appealing out of the box
- Accurate text rendering for common photoreal use cases like posters, storefront signs, and simple packaging
- Lower per-image credit cost for rapid iteration and exploring multiple photoreal compositions
- Great fit for creative photoreal concepts where mood, styling, and overall look matter as much as strict realism
Verdict
For maximum photorealism and production-ready deliverables—especially where fine detail, realistic materials, and dependable typography matter—Nano Banana Pro is typically the safer choice. Its 4K option and emphasis on marketing-grade output make it better suited to “zoom in and it still holds up” realism.
If you’re optimizing for cost-efficient exploration and a stylish photoreal look (with solid text handling for many scenarios), Reve is a strong pick—particularly during concepting, mood tests, and high-volume variation runs.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Nano Banana Pro, Reve, and all our other AI models for photorealistic.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand